Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 sacks in 5 games


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Our linebackers and secondary completely negate any pass rush we have. They have to play so far off the ball that teams are just going to take the 5-7 yards and move along. 
 

Linebacker is a major need next offseason, however, I’m not sure I want to see us take another one in the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

We may need someone to put next to Brown.  Weatherly has been a bit underwhelming as well.  Snow doesn't seem to like the wild McD-esque blitz packages so we need some better beef.  We're dealing with flank steak and need a porterhouse.

Dont you be hating on a flank steak, They each have their place. We need a ribeye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Our defense has been fine for the youth on the field. And our offense has directly lead to 21 points this year by having turnovers within our own 25 yard line. 

If ATL didn't drop have their passes in the soft zone last week we'd be toast right now. Thats a systemic issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make it 6 games, but I digress. We also play QBs who get it out fast (which directly led to 3 picks we’ve gotten), but I’m seeing one DL generating consistent pressure (Burns) and one DL clogging the line with any regularity (Brown). Kerr has his moments today and YGM and Haynes have also done well, but it’s really been just two guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

Our linebackers and secondary completely negate any pass rush we have. They have to play so far off the ball that teams are just going to take the 5-7 yards and move along. 
 

Linebacker is a major need next offseason, however, I’m not sure I want to see us take another one in the first. 

I get how people poo themselves when we draft a LB in the first, but Dan Morgan, Thomas Davis, Jon Beason and Luke Kuechly were pretty decent players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Meanwhile, our less talented defense with a coordinator hardly anyone wanted is actually outplaying our more talented offense with the coordinator virtually everyone wanted.

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

I'd look at a situation where Snow remains on the staff but transitions into a consultant/assistant HC.  He helps Rhule out. 

Key is finding that DC and a leader or two at LB and DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

We put a lot of misfit toys on defense and we’re 3-3 with a DC who’s never been an NFL DC. They’ve exceeded my expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think what makes a qb elite is when every week you think your team has a chance to win because of your qb. No matter who they play, they always make you feel like you have a chance. I have not gotten that feeling once while watching Bryce. 
    • Great point!  The quotes from O'Connell about teams failing rookie Qbs and the one about how you coach them after 3 picks and a loss were really interesting.  To me, an idiot with a keyboard, it means NFL teams need to be patience if they are going to have quality QB play. So bringing me to Bryce, is there some benefit to being patient.  I know it's not a particularly popular opinion around here, and even I am having a hard time wrapping my head around it.  Most QBs, when benched lose their confidence.  It takes a LONG time to get it back.  Bryce on the other hand was benched, and came back a different player.  I feel like that's worth a lot more than the physical talents of a guys like AR15... I think Bryce has the mental make up to be a good NFL QB.  His problem will always be his tools.  Now it's on coaching to work around that.  Bryce is more physically gifted than late years Drew Brees (low bar, I know).   While I'm content to see what happens this season, there's a small part of me that says...maybe we should see what grows?  (let me duck and hide from the well earned vitriol the Panthers have earned). Then again, I agree that some guys get it while others just don't.  I'm still hoping for the Panthers and Bryce to find success this season.  But if not, I won't be too surprised if the plug is pulled and there is a restart.
×
×
  • Create New...