Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 sacks in 5 games


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Our linebackers and secondary completely negate any pass rush we have. They have to play so far off the ball that teams are just going to take the 5-7 yards and move along. 
 

Linebacker is a major need next offseason, however, I’m not sure I want to see us take another one in the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

We may need someone to put next to Brown.  Weatherly has been a bit underwhelming as well.  Snow doesn't seem to like the wild McD-esque blitz packages so we need some better beef.  We're dealing with flank steak and need a porterhouse.

Dont you be hating on a flank steak, They each have their place. We need a ribeye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Our defense has been fine for the youth on the field. And our offense has directly lead to 21 points this year by having turnovers within our own 25 yard line. 

If ATL didn't drop have their passes in the soft zone last week we'd be toast right now. Thats a systemic issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make it 6 games, but I digress. We also play QBs who get it out fast (which directly led to 3 picks we’ve gotten), but I’m seeing one DL generating consistent pressure (Burns) and one DL clogging the line with any regularity (Brown). Kerr has his moments today and YGM and Haynes have also done well, but it’s really been just two guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

Our linebackers and secondary completely negate any pass rush we have. They have to play so far off the ball that teams are just going to take the 5-7 yards and move along. 
 

Linebacker is a major need next offseason, however, I’m not sure I want to see us take another one in the first. 

I get how people poo themselves when we draft a LB in the first, but Dan Morgan, Thomas Davis, Jon Beason and Luke Kuechly were pretty decent players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Meanwhile, our less talented defense with a coordinator hardly anyone wanted is actually outplaying our more talented offense with the coordinator virtually everyone wanted.

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

I'd look at a situation where Snow remains on the staff but transitions into a consultant/assistant HC.  He helps Rhule out. 

Key is finding that DC and a leader or two at LB and DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Our play has major personnel holes in it yes, but the scheme gets blown up pretty easily and the players are the ones keeping us in the game. The ATL game came down to their drops. Its simply not a high caliber NFL defense. Im happy to give rhule+snow a year for next year, they got a lot of at odds pieces and young bloods. but next year if this is the same thing, chopping block.

We put a lot of misfit toys on defense and we’re 3-3 with a DC who’s never been an NFL DC. They’ve exceeded my expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...