Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does the offense suck ass in the 4th quarter with the game on the line?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

In all 4 losses the offense has had the ball with a chance to tie or win the game and in all 4 losses the offense has found a variety of ways to f*ck it up.  

Against the Raiders it was a 4th and short stop.

Against the Bucs it was a Bridgewater INT 

Against the Bears it was a 4th down DJ Moore drop

Against the Saints it’s a sack on 3rd down 

The defense is full of guys who should be on the bench, but in every game it’s the offense lead by a QB making $20m a year that finds ways to lose.

Theres a lot to be optimistic about but killer instinct isn’t something that can be coached or taught and this team straight up doesn’t have it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big players make big plays in big situations.  Our offense, unfortunately, doesn't yet have enough of those players.  Unfortunately, it starts with the QB.  Teddy is a GOOD QB.  I think in those situations you need something more than just good.

Teddy is an A+ human being and leader.  Unfortunately he's only a B- QB.

Edit:  And B- is *way* more than I thought we would get from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Big players make big plays in big situations. 

Yeah like Aaron Rodgers against the bucs last week when Adams was out.  obviously a QB is all you need to elevate your team this isn't a bullshit myth at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Big players make big plays in big situations. 

Yeah like Aaron Rodgers against the bucs last week when Adams was out.  obviously a QB is all you need to elevate your team this isn't a bullshit myth at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Big players make big plays in big situations. 

Yeah like Aaron Rodgers against the bucs last week when Adams was out.  obviously a QB is all you need to elevate your team this isn't a bullshit myth at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanls internet.

Anyway our problem in the 4th is we can hide our oline when we're trying to come back.

Last week and this week emphasised we can't hold blocks for long across the line nor handle stunts well. All season we've been passing quick very often because our oline sucked (something bitch about now despite how we rightfully bitched we didn't do it enough with Cam/Shula). When Teddy had time he's shown he's not afraid to take shots or hit more intermediate routes. Hell he even took a great deep shot in tight man coverage. We need oline. Bad.

Even against our mediocre defense when we brought pressure or rushed 4, Saints oline held up for someone to get open. We don't have that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

In all 4 losses the offense has had the ball with a chance to tie or win the game and in all 4 losses the offense has found a variety of ways to f*ck it up.  

Against the Raiders it was a 4th and short stop.

Against the Bucs it was a Bridgewater INT 

Against the Bears it was a 4th down DJ Moore drop

Against the Saints it’s a sack on 3rd down 

The defense is full of guys who should be on the bench, but in every game it’s the offense lead by a QB making $20m a year that finds ways to lose.

Theres a lot to be optimistic about but killer instinct isn’t something that can be coached or taught and this team straight up doesn’t have it.

 

Raiders: If Slye had made that kick earlier in the game, the offense wouldn't have to be forced to go for it on 4th.

Bears: Mike Davis fumbled (after having some ridiculous stat of never fumbling) in crunch time

In fairness, Teddy did quite a bit of damage on his own against the Bucs.

The point is though, you can't put a loss on a sole player. That is one thing that one of the best coaches I ever played for talked to us about after a game once. One of our players was really upset that he was the last out of the game (baseball) and was being really hard on himself. Coach Kellum pointed out that there was a dropped pop fly in the 4th that let the other team score a run, an infielder errored and allowed a different guy to get a single that turned into a run. We had left men on the bases in more than one inning. I had never thought of it that way until he addressed us after that particular game. It really is a team effort in sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rags said:

Yeah like Aaron Rodgers against the bucs last week when Adams was out.  obviously a QB is all you need to elevate your team this isn't a bullshit myth at all.

 

A poor example that isn't relevant. No one is saying elite players, or even entire teams (including coaches) don't have bad days or even just get flat out beat. Point is that good performances far outweigh the bad and that the job gets done more often than not when franchise-type players are involved.

Now, with that said this is not an ideal year. It is fair to ask these questions IMO but unreasonable to try to draw any definitive conclusions. The jury should remain out for more or less everyone until the season is over, but Teddy has the personal disadvantage of already having multiple seasons of mediocre film and/or production to overcome as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the coaches get all nervous and conservative.
 

Teddy has ice water in his veins...cool and calm under pressure.

In close games they should just let him be an "on-the-field OC".  He is smart enough to do it.
Brady and Rhule act like bumbling keystone cops when things are close late in a game.
Let Teddy run the show and better results would happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KSpan said:

A poor example that isn't relevant. No one is saying elite players, or even entire teams (including coaches) don't have bad days or even just get flat out beat. Point is that good performances far outweigh the bad and that the job gets done more often than not when franchise-type players are involved.

Now, with that said this is not an ideal year. It is fair to ask these questions IMO but unreasonable to try to draw any definitive conclusions. The jury should remain out for more or less everyone until the season is over, but Teddy has the personal disadvantage of already having multiple seasons of mediocre film and/or production to overcome as well.

Disagree strongly on all points.

Teddy's good has far outweighed his bad this season. He's kept us in every game and he's bounced back from mistakes both in game and even the following games.

We've constantly seen all season how people act like any Elite Talent can work with bums.  Our oline are mostly bums outside of Moton and Okung (when he's not getting dinged which has been a problem throughout his career.). If ARod gets a pass when his best (and only real outside support despite having other functional enough players around him) is Teddy not getting the same pass for having an O-line, esp interior o-line where its been the most garbage in pass pro, espcially when you can just as easily argue this offense is only working so well because of him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...