Eagles receiving calls about Carson Wentz

[TheSpecialJuan]

Don't be surprised if Panthers trade for Wentz 

[Shocker]

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

You mean “regression”?

Yeah...I am on a fuggin ipad.  Autocorrect got me again.  That and beer.

Edited February 6, 2021 by Shocker

[LinvilleGorge]

This is NOT good for us. This makes the Eagles almost certainly to take a QB in the 1st. They're already ahead of us in the draft order and after a Wentz trade they'll have more draft capital to swing a trade up if need be. With Stafford and Wentz getting traded, that's two breaks that went badly against us for a QB at #8.

[Shocker]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

This is NOT good for us. This makes the Eagles almost certainly to take a QB in the 1st. They're already ahead of us in the draft order and after a Wentz trade they'll have more draft capital to swing a trade up if need be. With Stafford and Wentz getting traded, that's two breaks that went badly against us for a QB at #8.

We have to go up to #3 regardless...we know that right?

[BurnNChinn]

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is NOT good for us. This makes the Eagles almost certainly to take a QB in the 1st. They're already ahead of us in the draft order and after a Wentz trade they'll have more draft capital to swing a trade up if need be. With Stafford and Wentz getting traded, that's two breaks that went badly against us for a QB at #8.

Yep totally agree this sucks. We should have just did a little more to get Stafford, we aren’t getting Watson hell they might not even trade him

[BurnNChinn]

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

We have to go up to #3 regardless...we know that right?

I’m not trading all that for 2nd best qb and hell I don’t even know who’s second best. Wilson gives me damn Clausen vibes

[BurnNChinn]

Damn now they saying Panthers are one of four teams interested. I mean how are we interested in Wentz, and Stafford first but are really trying to get Watson. Like if u get one of those first then no Watson.

[NAS]

If we get Wentz I am going to lose it

[Tarheel119]

It could be we’re not interested in giving up a king’s ransom for Watson. I happen to think the Texans are still playing hardball. They have all the cards at the moment. 

[Tarheel119]

Wentz was a good QB not long ago. However, last year was not good. I think he’s certainly better than TB. Plus, it doesn’t negate the prospects of taking a QB and having him sit if one falls. 

[TheCasillas]

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is NOT good for us. This makes the Eagles almost certainly to take a QB in the 1st. They're already ahead of us in the draft order and after a Wentz trade they'll have more draft capital to swing a trade up if need be. With Stafford and Wentz getting traded, that's two breaks that went badly against us for a QB at #8.

They will roll with Jalen hurts... they have a bigger need at WR and Secondary. 

[TheCasillas]

23 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Damn now they saying Panthers are one of four teams interested. I mean how are we interested in Wentz, and Stafford first but are really trying to get Watson. Like if u get one of those first then no Watson.

In on every deal

[TheSpecialJuan]

I think we're going in hard for Wentz

If we were willing to give up Teddy #8 overall pick and possibly a 4th or 5th rounder for Stafford we're certainly willing to offer that same deal for 28 year old Wentz

[woahfraze]

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

I think we're going in hard for Wentz

If we were willing to give up Teddy #8 overall pick and possibly a 4th or 5th rounder for Stafford we're certainly willing to offer that same deal for 28 year old Wentz

Wentz's contract has to change the package.  For that salary, and the risk that his recent regression was toward the mean rather than a temporary dip in performance, means we shouldn't be giving up a huge package.