Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins have received many calls for pick number 3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Dude....Haskins had a QBR in that game of 4.1 We were not winning that game with his performance, the terrible special teams play that they had, and Ron Rivera being Ron Rivera. No blatant attempt to tank would change that and it’s pointless to keep complaining about it.

I don't know that we would have lost the game, but you propped up Walker saying he won the only game he played in. I pointed out that wasn't true, and that when he played against a better defense he looked terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know that we would have lost the game, but you propped up Walker saying he won the only game he played in. I pointed out that wasn't true, and that when he played against a better defense he looked terrible.

I guess my bigger point was that even with him starting, I don’t see us winning that game based on how horrible the entire Washington football team played that day including 4.1 QBR Haskins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I guess my bigger point was that even with him starting, I don’t see us winning that game based on how horrible the entire Washington football team played that day including 4.1 QBR Haskins 

And it's possible we still would have won. But the suggestion that putting Walker in there would have made us more likely to win just doesn't hold up.

He just isn't that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't think Lance or Fields is worth the climb, then make a trade for Darnold or Minchew (on a rookie contract) and trade back this year for a first rounder in 2022.  In 2022, if Darnold or Minshew does not work out, trade up for a QB-

Not what we want to hear,  but finding a young qb to develop from another team is just about as risky as taking one from the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

.  Rhule didn’t give a poo about the draft when he was playing Washington. He job is to get his team prepared to win that game and he did. I’ve never understood all this crying about a win... I don’t see many analysts stating “you know if Carolina just lost that game 4 weeks ago they would have a better draft pick. Such a bad call winning that one...” We won and we were the better team. That’s what should and did happen. Let our staff figure out the draft now since it’s that time of year.

Analysts don’t care about Carolina.  They care about winning teams or the worst team in the league getting the first pick 

the only position that really matters in the draft is QB, if a team doesn’t have one,  and the Panthers don’t    

if you know you have a chance at a top 3, you don’t blow it.  The Jets blew it.  They had Trevor Lawrence.  They don’t anymore.  The Panthers blew it.  Now instead of getting the number 3, they have to mortgage their future to move up .  stupid 

then again, it was the same smart panthers brain trust that brought Teddy here in the first place;  therefore, their judgement is suspect from the beginning 

...and yes, I understand ‘you play to win the game’ however there is more than one game to consider, it’s 10 years of stable QB position for a franchise.

Nonetheless, we can go to bed and sleep at night safe in the knowledge that Rhule cares about our ‘culture’ in one breath and bringing in Haskins in the other  .He would do well to learn this isn’t div 1 anymore 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Analysts don’t care about Carolina.  They care about winning teams or the worst team in the league getting the first pick 

the only position that really matters in the draft is QB, if a team doesn’t have one,  and the Panthers don’t    

if you know you have a chance at a top 3, you don’t blow it.  The Jets blew it.  They had Trevor Lawrence.  They don’t anymore.  The Panthers blew it.  Now instead of getting the number 3, they have to mortgage their future to move up .  stupid 

then again, it was the same smart panthers brain trust that brought Teddy here in the first place;  therefore, their judgement is suspect from the beginning 

...and yes, I understand ‘you play to win the game’ however there is more than one game to consider, it’s 10 years of stable QB position for a franchise.

Nonetheless, we can go to bed and sleep at night safe in the knowledge that Rhule cares about our ‘culture’ in one breath and bringing in Haskins in the other  .He would do well to learn this isn’t div 1 anymore 

Yeah you are right we should have benched every starter and punted the ball to make sure we get Fields or Wilson locked up without having to give up anything. 100% all in on the draft. What a message to send to your young team right. You have been playing well, hung around with GB and KC, but we want to make sure we get this rookie QB from BYU that has already had shoulder surgery, so put your competitive nature aside and if any little fans that are able to go to these games can suck it up and watch this shitty performance to make sure we lose to Haskins...

Once again, Pederson tried this poo with the Eagles and now that team is a mess and he is unemployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there have been inquiries with the Dolphins about what they would want to move the pick.  I would be surprised if they gave a halfway firm answer to any of them, unless they want a king's ransom.  Given how close they look to being a playoff team, they may not want to move it at all.  Even if they are fine with their QB situation, how often are they going to have a shot at a Sewell, Chase, Smith, Waddle, or pretty much their pick to address their relatively few needs?  Remember, they have it this year thanks to the skillful maneuvering of the Houston Texans.

WR is one of the Dolphins' needs, from what I read.  That actually could work in our favor if we are going after their #3 pick.  There are three potential marque receivers.  The Dolphins probably very much want one of them and don't want to go too far down the board for fear of losing that shot. Again, the Texans don't come along every year offering up what turns out to be a #3 pick.

I said this before, but the Foreskins would have lost to the '76 Tampa Bay Buccaneers that week. They were that terrible, and while most of it was on Haskins, they made a few other boneheaded plays to add to the fun.  We really didn't do much to win that game, but they dug a hole and then could not get out of their own way enough to salvage a win against a team stuck in neutral.  But, while we were in neutral, they were in reverse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah you are right we should have benched every starter and punted the ball to make sure we get Fields or Wilson locked up without having to give up anything. 100% all in on the draft. What a message to send to your young team right. You have been playing well, hung around with GB and KC, but we want to make sure we get this rookie QB from BYU that has already had shoulder surgery, so put your competitive nature aside and if any little fans that are able to go to these games can suck it up and watch this shitty performance to make sure we lose to Haskins...

Once again, Pederson tried this poo with the Eagles and now that team is a mess and he is unemployed.

There is a difference between throwing the game and giving an opportunity for lesser players to earn a position.  If the starters are 4-10, why would you not play the young guys?  All is not black and white--what the Eagles did-that was losing intentionally.  However, giving Grier a start and letting your rookies play the game is not throwing the game if you game plan to win.  You are likely to lose, but you are not trying to lose.

So you might ask, "Why stack the deck to lose and then try to win?"  Because you have an objective--what if you can win with cheaper players?  How will gaining experience help your team? With nothing to play for, what is wrong with giving Grier a look? Some experience?  Are you telling Grier to lose?  No. If he wins, it could change things.  What was the benefit for winning with a QB you are going to cut? 

I would argue that Rhule's job is not to win meaningless games once the team has been eliminated from the playoffs.  I would argue his job IS to develop players at all times.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

If you don't think Lance or Fields is worth the climb, then make a trade for Darnold or Minchew (on a rookie contract) and trade back this year for a first rounder in 2022.  In 2022, if Darnold or Minshew does not work out, trade up for a QB-

Not what we want to hear,  but finding a young qb to develop from another team is just about as risky as taking one from the draft.

I always support the Minshew and trade back idea, but not sure i can get on board with Darnold. Just not sure i can get behind the cost for him on a trial run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheProcess said:

I always support the Minshew and trade back idea, but not sure i can get on board with Darnold. Just not sure i can get behind the cost for him on a trial run. 

I am uncertain about both, but the only thing that could separate them from Fields or Lance is the unknown--we know how Minshew and Darnold look on bad teams--which is more than we know about Lance or Fields--they have upsides--but Darnold was in perhaps the worst situation a QB could be in--I am not sold on the idea, but if they see something in his skill set that could be salvaged, they need to consider it.  Minshew, on the other hand, reminds me of a potential Jake 2.0.  Def my favorite option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Analysts don’t care about Carolina.  They care about winning teams or the worst team in the league getting the first pick 

the only position that really matters in the draft is QB, if a team doesn’t have one,  and the Panthers don’t    

if you know you have a chance at a top 3, you don’t blow it.  The Jets blew it.  They had Trevor Lawrence.  They don’t anymore.  The Panthers blew it.  Now instead of getting the number 3, they have to mortgage their future to move up .  stupid 

then again, it was the same smart panthers brain trust that brought Teddy here in the first place;  therefore, their judgement is suspect from the beginning 

...and yes, I understand ‘you play to win the game’ however there is more than one game to consider, it’s 10 years of stable QB position for a franchise.

Nonetheless, we can go to bed and sleep at night safe in the knowledge that Rhule cares about our ‘culture’ in one breath and bringing in Haskins in the other  .He would do well to learn this isn’t div 1 anymore 

I like this response.  I get the other side--I really do--but once you are eliminated, I would argue that winning is a mute point.  It means nothing.  Developing youth means something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I am uncertain about both, but the only thing that could separate them from Fields or Lance is the unknown--we know how Minshew and Darnold look on bad teams--which is more than we know about Lance or Fields--they have upsides--but Darnold was in perhaps the worst situation a QB could be in--I am not sold on the idea, but if they see something in his skill set that could be salvaged, they need to consider it.  Minshew, on the other hand, reminds me of a potential Jake 2.0.  Def my favorite option.

We should be able to land Minshew cheaply if they are willing to trade him. If he works out, Great! If he doesn't, then we go all in next year and having Minshew as a backup is better than the current situation.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah you are right we should have benched every starter and punted the ball to make sure we get Fields or Wilson locked up without having to give up anything. 100% all in on the draft. What a message to send to your young team right. You have been playing well, hung around with GB and KC, but we want to make sure we get this rookie QB from BYU that has already had shoulder surgery, so put your competitive nature aside and if any little fans that are able to go to these games can suck it up and watch this shitty performance to make sure we lose to Haskins...

Once again, Pederson tried this poo with the Eagles and now that team is a mess and he is unemployed.

There are ways to do things   He would have been within his role to see what he had on his bench to make decisions in the future but you start the game that way.

again, the long view of the franchise is far more important than a meaningless game in a lost season   

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Made this list after viewing multiple articles. First thoughts: Would remove Bill, Arthur, and Josh McCown I already took out Deion and replaced him with Dan Lanning. 
    • Note: List is not in order of best-least   Inactive former head coaches Mike McCarthy He doesn't get enough credit for what he's done with the Packers (especially early on) and the Cowboys. His current ceiling might not be the highest, but he's won a Super Bowl and is a respected name to stabilize a franchise. Jon Gruden Gruden left the NFL on bad terms and is trying to regain the respect of some around (and outside of) the league.   Offensive coordinators Joe Brady, Buffalo Bills The Bills' offense undoubtedly got better since Brady took over, and his name is as hot right now as it was when he took over the Panthers' OC job in 2020. He's a part of the process to make Josh Allen, already an elite quarterback, into the MVP he has been. Todd Monken, Baltimore Ravens Monken was close to the top of last year's list, and he deserves credit for making Lamar Jackson an even better passing quarterback.  Mike Kafka, New York Giants Kafka has been mentioned as a future head coach for around four years now, even though the lack of collective success in New York doesn't help. Last year, he was promoted to assistant head coach in addition to his OC title to elevate his status. Kliff Kingsbury, Washington Commanders Kingsbury had a four-year stint as the Cardinals head coach, with limited success. However, he's at a different moment of his career, and the performance with the Commanders' offense is notable. John Morton, Detroit Lions The Lions lost Ben Johnson, and John Morton has done a good job early on to replace him, as the Lions still sit among the best offenses in the NFL. Josh McCown, Minnesota Vikings quarterbacks coach McCown is the only position coach in this year's list, and that's because he's been mentioned as a future head coach since he finished his playing days. He's had HC interviews. Josh Grizzard, Tampa Bay Buccaneers The Bucs have lost their OC to HC jobs two years in a row, with Panthers' Dave Canales and Jaguars' Liam Coen. And the offense is still a top 10 unit, which almost automatically puts Grizzard in the conversation. Arthur Smith, Pittsburgh Steelers Smith had a three-year stint with the Falcons, and it didn't go great. But he's a sharp offensive mind, and if he can take the most out of the Aaron Rodgers experience in Pittsburgh, his name will be around. Klint Kubiak, Seattle Seahawks Kubiak had a fast start with the Saints last year, but one he couldn't sustain due to multiple injuries throughout the roster—which included quarterback Derek Carr. This year, he's elevated the Seahawks' offense with Sam Darnold at quarterback, and his background under Kyle Shanahan and his dad Gary Kubiak is an interesting element.   Defensive coordinators Jesse Minter, Los Angeles Chargers With a top 5 defense, Minter is one of the hottest names in this cycle. He's still relatively young at 42, has strong NFL and college coaching experience, and his leadership style is impressive—learning behind Jim Harbaugh certainly helps. Brian Flores, Minnesota Vikings As a defensive mind, Flores is as good as anyone in the NFL. He would have to answer some questions about his failed time with the Dolphins as a head coach, but he's so consistently good at DC that new opportunities should arise. Jeff Hafley, Green Bay Packers A former college head coach at Boston College, Hafley has transformed the Packers' defense after failed experiences with previous coordinators. He's a great defensive mind and an excellent communicator. Robert Saleh, San Francisco 49ers Saleh's tenure with the Jets was bad, but it's hard to blame him too much. His defenses will always be at least solid, and a more stable franchise could offer him a better shot. Jim Schwartz, Cleveland Browns Schwartz is that type of DC that has already been a head coach a long time ago (Lions, between 2009 and 2013), and it feels like he's satisfied being a coordinator. But he's been so successful with the Browns that he at least deserves to be mentioned. Anthony Campanile, Jacksonville Jaguars Campanile was highly respected during his time with the Dolphins and Packers, and now he's making the most out of his early stages as the Jaguars DC. He's considered a strong leader. Vance Joseph, Denver Broncos Joseph had a failed stint as the Broncos head coach, but he's so respected that the franchise hired him back as a DC. And he's done an excellent job in this area. Chris Shula, Los Angeles Rams Sean McVay's coaching tree is as good as there is, and Shula has been with the Rams since McVay's original coaching staff was built in 2017. He's been promoted five times, including to DC in 2024. He's made the most out of a young defensive group.   College coaches Bill Belichick, North Carolina Nobody in the NFL wanted Belichick in 2024 and 2025, but that could always change if a franchise wants a strong leader for a short period of time. Steve Sarkisian, Texas Multiple college coaches are wanting to make the transition to the NFL, and Sarkisian could be the next one. His most recent NFL experience was as the Falcons offensive coordinator between 2017 and 2018. Matt Campbell, Iowa State Perceived as a program builder, Campbell has been mentioned as a potential NFL coach for years now. Lincoln Riley, USC Riley helped develop three first overall pick quarterbacks in Baker Mayfield, Kyler Murray, and Caleb Williams, so the blueprint of what he could do is there. Developing passers is his calling card. Ryan Day, Ohio State Day has had a lot of success in college, including a national championship in 2024. And he has experience in the NFL as a quarterbacks coach for the Eagles and 49ers under Chip Kelly. Dan Lanning, Oregon Head coach Dan Lanning has done a tremendous job with this football program. He has been the head coach since the 2022 season. Oregon went undefeated during the regular season last year and has a chance to lead them to another one this season. What are the odds that Lanning could potentially be getting interesting from other NFL teams this offseason?
×
×
  • Create New...