Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes because that what Teddy was brought here for...More accuracy better decision making, making quicker reads... 

 

15TDs and 13Ints would have any team looking for another QB.. No matter what you think..

Ball control offenses keeps you in games. This ain't Madden.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Breakpoint4510 said:

Ball control offenses keeps you in games. This ain't Madden.

Again ... Ryan Tannahill runs a “real” ball control offense and had less passing attempts then Teddy...

Put up 33 tds- 7ints...

Why couldn’t Teddy come close to those numbers??

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Let's go. Teddy ran a ball control offense in order to protect a leaky defense. You got a problem with that?

Teddy looked exactly how he's always looked, and the stats and outcomes show it. The wheels fell off the offense when defenses got a bit of film and started sitting on everything under 20 yards with no threat of a deep game. It's no coincidence.

Ball control offense may keep teams hanging around in games but it doesn't win championships but once in a blue moon when it's paired with an all-decade defense. I live in KC and saw the Alex Smith years firsthand - it's also no coincidence that they didn't get anywhere in the playoffs until Mahomes took over.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Ball control offenses keeps you in games. This ain't Madden.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/average-time-of-possession-net-of-ot

50% of the teams in the playoffs this year were in the bottom half of the league when it came to t.o.p... the teams in the super bowl were in the bottom half as well, and the sb champs were in the bottom quarter....
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yeah he ran them into a 4-11 record and 15tds and 11 int’s ... BAD QB #!!!

That's your problem right there. Teddy makes the Panthers look credible on offense in spite of a defense that's atrocious on third down, and you blame him. No appreciation what so ever. Where's Rhule, Brady and Snow's culpability. They have no role in the Panther's 5-11 season? Why is it all on Teddy Bridgewater?

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/average-time-of-possession-net-of-ot

50% of the teams in the playoffs this year were in the bottom half of the league when it came to t.o.p... the teams in the super bowl were in the bottom half as well, and the sb champs were in the bottom quarter....
 

Playoff teams stop someone every once in a while.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

That's your problem right there. Teddy makes the Panthers look credible on offense in spite of a defense that's atrocious on third down, and you blame him. No appreciation what so ever. Where's Rhule, Brady and Snow's culpability. They have no role in the Panther's 5-11 season? Why is it all on Teddy Bridgewater?

They won with PJ Walker..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

That's your problem right there. Teddy makes the Panthers look credible on offense in spite of a defense that's atrocious on third down, and you blame him. No appreciation what so ever. Where's Rhule, Brady and Snow's culpability. They have no role in the Panther's 5-11 season? Why is it all on Teddy Bridgewater?

Yet again, please show where anyone is *solely* placing blame on Teddy. You're in a thread about teddy - of course the conversation centers on his performance/lack thereof. Teddy's offense had chances to win games week in and week out regardless of what the other phases were doing and couldn't do it. It's self-contained empirical shortcoming.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @ForJimmy--I watched his '24 highlights and there's a lot to like.  He's mobile, for certain, but it seems that's his default because he's so good at it.  Lots of RPO stuff.  He's slippery in the pocket, but too quick to vacate it.  I saw very few pocket throws into tight windows, which is the hallmark of an elite QB, especially at the next level.  Green is a playmaker, there's no denying that.  I thought his arm was adequate to above average.  I assumed a big QB like that would have a cannon.  Ball placement was also above average. He's an intriguing prospect, but I'm not sure he's going to end up a top 10 prospect and that's where we are most certainly going to be picking.  If Sellers doesn't come out, he's probably the next best dual threat QB.
    • I was right there with you. I hoped for the best and tried to support once he was drafted. But the media created legend of Bryce Young the draft prospect was honestly like nothing I've ever seen. For a kid who didn't even play all that particularly great for Alabama (Mac Jones was the better college QB and it really wasn't close) he received an insane level of benefit of the doubt. From his supposed elite football IQ elite processing elite preparation elite field general abilities elite leadership yada yada the guy could do absolutely no wrong. Even when he showed up to the combine and hid out in a hoodie refusing to throw nobody batted an eye. And even after that he was still compared to current and past hall of famers in the NFL and other sports across the spectrum. If he didn't play for Saban and Alabama it would have been and would be right now completely different in the way he was and is perceived. But again. I've never seen anything like it for other prospects that I can think of in recent memory. Others have been dissected in some way or another. Maybe the only other comparison I would make would be Andrew Luck. But Luck had the necessary physical intangibles that Bryce Young very plainly lacked when you sit down and watch the tape. It was crazy then and it is still crazy now. 🤷‍♂️
    • Yeah I didn’t remember how many guys were on offense besides him that were taken but did figure he was facing one, maybe two guys that would be drafted from whatever defense it he was playing. Then the out of conference games against smaller schools that are basically exhibitions, sheesh, you know they can feast.    The other thing is, out of those 62, how many really had NFL bodies at that point? Few of them. Most will be different players after a year of NFL training and body development. So you have to think about what the difference is. Even with the SEC guys that got taken, they will be better in the pros too. So when you factor all that in, and look at the Bryce tape and the Bryce pro day and whatever, I just will never understand why.
×
×
  • Create New...