Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richard Sherman thinks Mac Jones criticized unfairly


panthers55
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chris Simms has been going to bat a lot for Mac Jones.  I've been listening to that on my drive to work the past couple of days.  Simms' point is that Jones can read, diagnose, and execute a play very quickly.  Simms also argues that Jones has more than enough functional arm strength.  He mentions a lot of Joe Burrow, minus the athleticism.  Blames poor pad/jersey fit for the questions on his body.  Or maybe Jones just has an ugly body?

It's been interesting to hear Simms talk about the various QBs and their fit, skills, and his evaluations.  He grew up in an NFL family, even played for a bit so he's got the chops.  He even said he'd love to be a GM one day, I guess going the Mike Mayock path?

Regardless of his defenders, my main concern remains with Jones is that he played on the best team, with the best skill players, OL, etc.  He didn't really have to put the team on his shoulders and elevate everyone.  Tua beat him out, and Tua had a pretty rocky rookie year.  

I don't trust that, or Fields for that matter.  Heck, Kellan Mond is looking better and better. When you consider A&M has put out some pretty good QBs recently, could be worse?  And hey, Simms is super high on Mond so yeah???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

t was fun reading some of the posts saying how dumb they thought Richard Sherman is. In essence if 99.9999% of the people who claimed him dumb were to meet him in real life they would soon discover the man is abundantly more intelligent than they are, has infinite more physical strength and athleticism than they ever would, could out think them in a heart beat, has a bank account they could only dream of and is pretty much their superior in every aspect of life. If you approach it from a primal standpoint the man could out brain them, out fight them, and pretty much out due them in every aspect of anything in life yet they laughed him off and called him dumb. I may not agree with Sherman fully but calling him dumb or not respecting the opinion of a man who is highly intelligent, highly athletic and faced some of the best QB's to ever walk on the field is just plain foolish and idiotic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

t was fun reading some of the posts saying how dumb they thought Richard Sherman is. In essence if 99.9999% of the people who claimed him dumb were to meet him in real life they would soon discover the man is abundantly more intelligent than they are, has infinite more physical strength and athleticism than they ever would, could out think them in a heart beat, has a bank account they could only dream of and is pretty much their superior in every aspect of life. If you approach it from a primal standpoint the man could out brain them, out fight them, and pretty much out due them in every aspect of anything in life yet they laughed him off and called him dumb. I may not agree with Sherman fully but calling him dumb or not respecting the opinion of a man who is highly intelligent, highly athletic and faced some of the best QB's to ever walk on the field is just plain foolish and idiotic.

You are right--he is very intelligent.  He also looks at the QB position very differently--he does not care if the QB can run or if his arm strength can throw a football through a rock wall--he knows timing--he is not the fastest DB, so he relies on his intelligence to anticipate--like a QB.  He knows that the ball arriving on time and accurately is nearly impossible to defend.  A running QB is someone else's job. 

Personally, I think Jones will go top 12.  I think Mond (based on the research I have done after seeing Simms' video on him) could be the steal of the draft--the "Russell Wilson" pick of 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...