Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Former QB's support Teddy..this week's pro days..from the Observer


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DFive said:

Go figure, two QBs who also could never put the team on their back voice their support for a QB who is in their same mold. Granted, Delhomme is the best of the bunch and I appreciate and respect what he has to say. But the fact is, Teddy Two Yards identified he was pressing and trying to do too much several times throughout the season. Now, either he is just all talk and no follow thru (which could very well be the case with Teddy) or maybe, just maybe, he’s not that good.  

Are you retarded?

Jake put the team on his back time after time. Christ he took us 80 plus yards in the final 2 minutes of the Superbowl to tie it.

He had a phenomenally better performance in the Superbowl and crunch time than Cam Newton could ever dream of.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If a non-Panther fan that didn't know the Panthers roster went to TC back in the day, they would've picked out Chris Weinke as our starter ten times out of ten and likely thought Jake was just some guy hoping for an injury or something to squeak onto the roster. He really did not look like an NFL QB in practice.

He  may not but damn come game time he could throw that back shoulder fade like nobody. 

And really if people go back and look when guys were way open he put it on the money deep (look at his record Superbowl td to Moose) ball would come straight down from the rafters where only his guy could catch it.

Or X clown. Perfectly thrown ball and it had heat on it.

Teddy couldn't be Jake if he found a Genie on a deserted island.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

Mahomes threw 38 touchdowns behind that offensive line last year. Bridgewater threw for a career high 15 touchdowns by comparison.

I certainly understand the sentiment and that we need to work on our line but let's be reasonable here please.

Thats not even close to true,The Chiefs lost both Fisher and Swartz late in the season/playoffs lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...