Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitch Trubisky


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Cam couldn't throw.

He really couldn't. The reason we went and got Benjamin and Funchess is because he was constantly air mailing guys especially deep outs.

He was just a bad passer especially in clutch plays. He constantly came up short at the end of games when he had to have a completion.

Great football player. Great running threat. Slightly above average passer. He did have a cannon. 

Not true at all. Cam became a clutch QB before his shoulder injuries. He made key plays. His arm beat Seattle, NE, Saints, Eagles in prime time.

He did make overthrows but Jake wasn’t any better. His magic was his ability hit Smitty, and then he got complacent and exposed when he couldn’t rely on him. Once he had Tommy John he wasn’t reading the field as well as he used to and he couldn’t force the passes like wanted.

Jake was great in 03/04 but he also had the element of surprise and just enough talent and moxy to get the team to win through fox ball. If Cam was on that 03 squad they’d be undefeated.  Jakes best performance as a leader was in 04 when he legitimately maxed out his abilities to turn the team around. That Jake might have an argument over some Cam seasons, but Newton in his prime? No contest.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Not true at all. Cam became a clutch QB before his shoulder injuries. He made key plays. His arm beat Seattle, NE, Saints, Eagles in prime time.

He did make overthrows but Jake wasn’t any better. His magic was his ability hit Smitty, and then he got complacent and exposed when he couldn’t rely on him. Once he had Tommy John he wasn’t reading the field as well as he used to and he couldn’t force the passes like wanted.

Jake was great in 03/04 but he also had the element of surprise and just enough talent and moxy to get the team to win through fox ball. If Cam was on that 03 squad they’d be undefeated.  Jakes best performance as a leader was in 04 when he legitimately maxed out his abilities to turn the team around. That Jake might have an argument over some Cam seasons, but Newton in his prime? No contest.

You're entitled to your opinion. 

I'll take the 03 team over the 15 team. Everyone healthy and Jake wins 7 out of 10 heads up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Cam couldn't throw.

He really couldn't. The reason we went and got Benjamin and Funchess is because he was constantly air mailing guys especially deep outs.

He was just a bad passer especially in clutch plays. He constantly came up short at the end of games when he had to have a completion.

Great football player. Great running threat. Slightly above average passer. He did have a cannon. 

Steve Beuerlein was a career 56.9% thrower. Jake Delhomme was a 59.4% thrower. Cam Newton is a career 60.1% thrower. 

 

Sooooo......who couldn't throw again?

As far as clutch, in 140 career games, Cam Newton has 16 4th quarter comebacks and 20 game winning drives. That is 0.114 4QC/GM and 0.143 GWD/GM.

Steve Beuerlein had 13 4QC and 16 GWD in 147 career games. That is 0.088 4QC/GM and 0.109 GWD/GM.

Jake Delhomme had 19 4QC and 24 GWD in 103 career games. That is 0.184 4QC/GM and 0.233 GWD/GM.

Cam also had the best TD% and INT% among the three. 

Frankly, aside from Jake being slightly better in the 4QC and GWD drive stats, pretty much nothing you said actually is true.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Steve Beuerlein was a career 56.9% thrower. Jake Delhomme was a 59.4% thrower. Cam Newton is a career 60.1% thrower. 

 

Sooooo......who couldn't throw again?

As far as clutch, in 140 career games, Cam Newton has 16 4th quarter comebacks and 20 game winning drives. That is 0.114 4QC/GM and 0.143 GWD/GM.

Steve Beuerlein had 13 4QC and 16 GWD in 147 career games. That is 0.088 4QC/GM and 0.109 GWD/GM.

Jake Delhomme had 19 4QC and 24 GWD in 103 career games. That is 0.184 4QC/GM and 0.233 GWD/GM.

Cam also had the best TD% and INT% among the three. 

Frankly, aside from Jake being slightly better in the 4QC and GWD drive stats, pretty much nothing you said actually is true.

You're entitled to your opinion. 

Prime Jake before the injuries took their toll is the best we've seen.

Just like I'll tell you Bo Jackson is the best RB to ever play. I don't care that he was cut down early due to the hip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Far from side tit, but my neck hair game is strong atm. 
 

I never said we couldn’t do better than Mitch. We could do worse though which you seem to disagree with. 

no i dont disagree.  a pile of sshit could always be smellier, stickier, and with more mass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You're entitled to your opinion. 

I'll take the 03 team over the 15 team. Everyone healthy and Jake wins 7 out of 10 heads up.

Well the 03 team had more talent and depth.  Cam carried the 15 squad on his back with Ted Ginn as his best WR. 

The only thing better about the 15 team was Cam, Olsen, Luke(Respect to D. Morgan), and Josh Norman. 
 

Cams out performed Jakes stats pretty much every year he’s been healthy. You say you don’t rank QBs on running ability. So Cam still beats him in passing. Also, it’s not really on Cam to not run the ball and play pocket QB just to prove an arbitrary point. I’ve never understood the notion that he had to play like someone else to show he was worthy.  If Jake could run like Cam, his passing numbers would be worse than they are. 
 

What I will say though is that Rivera took the quickest route to success and overused the RPO to Cams detriment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

 

Prime Jake before the injuries took their toll is the best we've seen.

Even Jake disagrees with this.

Jake was a borderline top 10 QB at his best. Cam Newton was the best football player in the world at his best.

Love both dudes, but this is no contest. It's like trying to argue that someone other than Smitty is the Panthers best WR or someone other than Peppers is our best DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Steve Beuerlein was a career 56.9% thrower. Jake Delhomme was a 59.4% thrower. Cam Newton is a career 60.1% thrower. 

Sooooo......who couldn't throw again?

If you're making that a major criteria, you're leaving yourself wide open to Teddy Bridgewater fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Me looking for all the Teddy Bridgewater fans.

OptimisticSmoothAndeancondor-small.gif

They do exist.

(or at least trolls pretending to be them do)

Point being though that we've repeatedly shot down completion percentage as a valid measure when it was used to support the notion that Bridgewater was a good quarterback. Using it as a standard now is antithetical to that.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

You're entitled to your opinion. 

Prime Jake before the injuries took their toll is the best we've seen.

Just like I'll tell you Bo Jackson is the best RB to ever play. I don't care that he was cut down early due to the hip.

Prime Jake had basically one season that would be in Cam Newton's top 5 seasons. 

You are entitled to your own opinions, you aren't entitled to your own facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bioscience Male Enhancement Gummies - Each man needs reliable and solid execution. Unfortunately, the making system inimically impacts their sexual achievement, leaving them low and weak. Bioscience Male Enhancement Gummies are a brand name answer for sexual issues since they reestablish execution as well as responsiveness in bed. The blend increments testosterone creation in the body, reestablishing ideal sexual equilibrium as well as immovable quality and determination for expanded length improvement. The gummies are likewise gigantic in impelling sound blood spread, which helps with the accomplishment of firmer and longer supporting through erections.   ➲➲➲ Deals LIVE➲➲➲Click Here To Visit – “OFFICIAL WEBSITE”   What Is The Functioning Methodology For Bioscience Male Enhancement Gummies? Prior to consuming the gummies, clients are all around inquisitive about how the overhaul limits. As per our survey and evaluation, the gummies act in a brand name method for reestablishing your thriving and sexual execution. The gummies desire to reestablish and bring testosterone creation up in the body. The male help substance assists with planning genuine execution and affirmation, as well as sexual succeeding and excitement. https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/8BUJZxBKNJU https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/qoTB00G0PZg https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/zJ_UUnCsjw8 https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/UUA2amgtoeg https://bioscience-male-enhancement-gu-469ad2.webflow.io/ https://bioscience-male-enhancement-gu-b956e2.webflow.io/ https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/9e70792a-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/f185f73e-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/4e664d16-b921-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/c8eee32d-b921-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/a0df0cdf-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/d6b587fd-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://medium.com/@kipo00/bioscience-male-enhancement-gummies-sexual-libido-merits-a-rock-execution-dcf1f6a1c5bf https://medium.com/@kipo00/bioscience-male-enhancement-gummies-2024-benefits-safe-effective-shocking-results-8a9acb0ca46e https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/bioscience-male-enhancement-gummies-sexual-libido-merits-a-rock-execution https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/bioscience-male-enhancement-gummies-ultimate-sexual-enhancement-for-male https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQpBbLuM5Z8YfHiCAqcYM-g0u4cxPiZmqIoMRKObNnE1bRCpDkrLllA6hJAYvtJzES3QnMX1R8spzA9/pubhtml https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SItV3GyQnbAemt9fqfrfl9Rc2-rCwhNYQaw8hygKhEA/edit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/OIQMqUVJjcg https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/7oxLsdQIxzU https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/8JAT0Y809KE https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/VIdrXpIQ0-Y https://love-bites-male-enhancement-gu-a11799.webflow.io/ https://love-bites-male-enhancement-gu-e16f55.webflow.io/ https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/62f1dada-b621-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/cfd300f7-b621-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/8094a1b7-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/7ac10ecb-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/a5f3ffb2-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/5f41eac6-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://medium.com/@kipo00/love-bites-male-enhancement-gummies-longer-sexual-staying-performance-f838d167e14b https://medium.com/@kipo00/love-bites-male-enhancement-gummies-2024-benefits-safe-effective-shocking-results-a60e0aa856b4 https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/love-bites-male-enhancement-gummies-longer-sexual-staying-performance https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/love-bites-male-enhancement-gummies-reviews-2024-dont-buy-without-knowing-cost https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/w_CO9rPcOxY https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/Xj95jSSWBjs https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/ZpGvLd1soX4 https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/telemetry/c/3Cjoejkm9uo https://boostaro-male-enhancement-9f7ea5.webflow.io/ https://boostaro-male-enhancement-b14657.webflow.io/ https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/f5be02a5-b621-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://uoc-sandbox.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/general-discussion/184adec0-b621-ef11-a296-001dd8095c57 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/6954bc8b-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://mec.high.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/f82fe9a0-b721-ef11-a296-001dd8019fe1 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/f4545d88-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://myiwa.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/83f5189b-b921-ef11-a81c-000d3ad98414 https://medium.com/@kipo00/boostaro-male-enhancement-new-criticial-customer-warning-2024-first-read-0e6100e779b2 https://medium.com/@kipo00/boostaro-male-enhancement-harness-concentration-with-enhancement-gummies-6ecc4104a67f https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/boostaro-male-enhancement-new-criticial-customer-warning-2024-first-read https://ipol-adey.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/06/02/boostaro-male-enhancement-sexual-libido-merits-a-rock-execution
    • Coke is still the top soda in America. But the runner up spot, long held by Pepsi, now belongs to Dr Pepper. After years of slowly gaining market share, Dr Pepper inched ahead of Pepsi as the number two soda brand in the country in 2023, according to market share data from Beverage Digest, a trade publication Coke: 19.2% Dr Pepper: 8.3% Pepsi: 8.3% (lower than Dr Pepper when carried out to more decimal places) Sprite: 8.1% Diet Coke: 7.8% https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/03/business/dr-pepper-pepsi/index.html 
    • Fair enough.   It wouldnt occur to me that not getting NBC was a reality
×
×
  • Create New...