Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Varking said:

Or they are looking to criticize because this is the time to do it. Outside of Lawrence who we have no shot at I’ll criticize anything legit concerning of any of the other three major QBs. Nobody was knocking Lance for missing deep. The knock on him from this pro day is he absolutely struggled with ball placement went throwing to his right. 
 

They’ve been grooming him for this pro day since his showcase ended and he either had an off day throwing right or it’s a legit issue. That’s the concern. For the argument of it can be fixed easily, can it? You think they haven’t been working on this for the past few months? He chose not to run so I imagine all of his training has gone towards throwing. 

Without 3 drops he went 60-of-65.  Struggled...lol!  I have no idea of the speed of those rent-a-wideouts he was using, but I guess you would have preferred he threw the ball short on the deep routes like Teddy. He gave the ball sufficient air and the guys could not get the extra step (that's how close ALL his misses were) to come down with them.

Trey struggled because of the legit misses, it happened to be more to one side?  Would it have been better to miss more on the left or would you have preferred 3 on the left versus only 2 on the right?  Keep kissing the Fields ring dude.

If Fields is less than 100% on his throws, I will pick it apart.  If two or more misses are to one side, the kid may as well be second round material.  If this sounds ridiculous, I'm taking pointers from someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Without 3 drops he went 60-of-65.  Struggled...lol!  I have no idea of the speed of those rent-a-wideouts he was using, but I guess you would have preferred he threw the ball short on the deep routes like Teddy. He gave the ball sufficient air and the guys could not get the extra step (that's how close ALL his misses were) to come down with them.

Trey struggled because of the legit misses, it happened to be more to one side?  Would it have been better to miss more on the left or would you have preferred 3 on the left versus only 2 on the right?  Keep kissing the Fields ring dude.

If Fields is less than 100% on his throws, I will pick it apart.  If two or more misses are to one side, the kid may as well be second round material.  If this sounds ridiculous, I'm taking pointers from someone.

He did struggle throwing to his right. That’s a fact. The passes weren’t on the money or near it they were often behind. Even the commentator started to notice the trend. I don’t care about overthrowing a deep ball. That’s better than underthrowing. I wasn’t calling those misses. It’s seems I’ve struck a nerve because I’m being critical rather than riding the hype train. I’ll give similar analysis for Fields and Wilson when they have their pro days. 
 

Fields isn’t even my #1 or 2 QB in this class. You’re just being dramatic. “Keep kissing the Fields ring”. He’s my number 6 player on the board. Lawrence and Wilson are in front of him. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Varking said:

He did struggle throwing to his right. That’s a fact. The passes weren’t on the money or near it they were often behind. Even the commentator started to notice the trend. I don’t care about overthrowing a deep ball. That’s better than underthrowing. I wasn’t calling those misses. It’s seems I’ve struck a nerve because I’m being critical rather than riding the hype train. I’ll give similar analysis for Fields and Wilson when they have their pro days. 
 

Fields isn’t even my #1 or 2 QB in this class. You’re just being dramatic. “Keep kissing the Fields ring”. He’s my number 6 player on the board. Lawrence and Wilson are in front of him. 

Trevor Lawrence had  a worse Pro day than Trey Lance...FACT! Trevor missed almost all of his to the left...FACT!  Trevor only had one legit drop by his HIS WRs. He threw a deep ball short where the WR had to turn and wait for the ball. FACT!  He missed deep on another deep ball, wrong shoulder and behind...FACT.  A WR had to make a diving grab on an ant-burner FACT!  Trevor never had a simulated pass rush on ANY throw...FACT.  I counted counted 15 incomplete passes.  Trey had 8.  I didn't count the passes, but it was said to be 52 for Trevor.  Lance had 65.  I forgot to mention he STURGGLED to keep his WRs in bounds during the redzone drills.

Do I need to keep on or do you just want to admit you don't like Trey Lance and will do anything to tear down the kid?

 

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Trevor Lawrence had  a worse Pro day than Trey Lance...FACT! Trevor missed almost all of his to the left...FACT!  Trevor only had one legit drop by his HIS WRs. He threw a deep ball short where the WR had to turn and wait for the ball. FACT!  He missed deep on another deep ball, wrong shoulder and behind...FACT.  A WR had to make a diving grab on an ant-burner FACT!  Trevor never had a simulated pass rush on ANY throw...FACT.  I counted counted 15 incomplete passes.  Trey had 8.  I didn't count the passes, but it was said to be 52 for Trevor.  Lance had 65.  I forgot to mention he STURGGLED to keep his WRs in bounds during the redzone drills.

Do I need to keep on or do you just want to admit you don't like Trey Lance and will do anything to tear down the kid?

 

Did I argue that Trevor Lawrence had a worse or better pro day? 
 

Does a pro day mean a guy is better or worse than another prospect? 
 

People jumped through the same hoops and made the same assumptions when I posted my concerns about Zach Wilson. And guess what!!! I happen to like Zach Wilson as a prospect. He’s my number 2 QB. 
 

As far as Lawrence there is nothing these other three QBs can do during a pro day that’s going to make me catapult them over Lawrence. He’s a more sound prospect than the others in my eyes and we have no shot at getting him so there is no need to even analyze him. He’s not an option for us. 
 

Does me pointing out he had issues throwing to his right mean I dislike him as a prospect and do not want him on our team? Absolutely not. So keep making up fake arguments like you did above. I didn’t compare pro days between the two at all. I didn’t compare Lance to Lawrence at all. You are literally making stuff up. 
 

Anybody taking a pro day performance as the be all end all of prospect evaluation is an idiot. Let’s also not forget that Lance has been preparing for this pro day for months longer than the other prospects because they were playing actual games. He’s just been training. 
 

I don’t have problems drafting Wilson, Fields or Lance. I do have concerns about each of them. I’d be happy to have any of the three taking over for Teddy: Stop making things up that other people aren’t arguing. Stop getting hurt because people are pointing out issues a player might have. Unless you happen to be Trey Lance I dont understand the need to defend his every breath. And if you are Trey Lance, log out and practice throwing to the right. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2021 at 7:00 AM, ladypanther said:

I've just got a good feeling about this guy.  Had the same feeling about CMC (yea..I know he had a great resume but many here wanted Fornette).

Here are some links to interesting writeups about him:

https://www.nfl.com/news/no-longer-ignored-ndsu-qb-trey-lance-has-nfl-s-attention

https://www.startribune.com/scouts-invade-fargo-to-see-ndsu-s-next-pro-qb-prospect-marshall-s-trey-lance/572614532/

https://undraftedthenetwork.com/2021/03/03/who-is-trey-lance-draft-profile/

I do as well. He seems to be comfortable in his own skin

i like him a lot better than Justin Fields from that perspective 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Did I argue that Trevor Lawrence had a worse or better pro day? 
 

Does a pro day mean a guy is better or worse than another prospect? 
 

People jumped through the same hoops and made the same assumptions when I posted my concerns about Zach Wilson. And guess what!!! I happen to like Zach Wilson as a prospect. He’s my number 2 QB. 
 

As far as Lawrence there is nothing these other three QBs can do during a pro day that’s going to make me catapult them over Lawrence. He’s a more sound prospect than the others in my eyes and we have no shot at getting him so there is no need to even analyze him. He’s not an option for us. 
 

Does me pointing out he had issues throwing to his right mean I dislike him as a prospect and do not want him on our team? Absolutely not. So keep making up fake arguments like you did above. I didn’t compare pro days between the two at all. I didn’t compare Lance to Lawrence at all. You are literally making stuff up. 
 

Anybody taking a pro day performance as the be all end all of prospect evaluation is an idiot. Let’s also not forget that Lance has been preparing for this pro day for months longer than the other prospects because they were playing actual games. He’s just been training. 
 

I don’t have problems drafting Wilson, Fields or Lance. I do have concerns about each of them. I’d be happy to have any of the three taking over for Teddy: Stop making things up that other people aren’t arguing. Stop getting hurt because people are pointing out issues a player might have. Unless you happen to be Trey Lance I dont understand the need to defend his every breath. And if you are Trey Lance, log out and practice throwing to the right. 

WOW!  For someone putting a dude under the microscope during his Pro Day and knocking his lack of games, you sure pulled a 180 there, lol!  Trevor needs to work on his ball placement in the endzone and on the left side too. I guess all those games hurt Trevor's accuracy and he should have opted out to work on his Pro Day! /end discussion

 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

WOW!  For someone putting a dude under the microscope during his Pro Day and knocking his lack of games, you sure pulled a 180 there, lol!  Trevor needs to work on his ball placement in the endzone and on the left side too. I guess all those games hurt Trevor's accuracy and he should have opted out to work on his Pro Day! /end discussion

 

 

It's because all he has is a pro day he played one rather awful game this season. 

*adds to ignore list*

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

WOW!  For someone putting a dude under the microscope during his Pro Day and knocking his lack of games, you sure pulled a 180 there, lol!  Trevor needs to work on his ball placement in the endzone and on the left side too. I guess all those games hurt Trevor's accuracy and he should have opted out to work on his Pro Day! /end discussion

 

 

Pulled a 180? You think because somebody has concerns about a player it means they can’t possibly be ok with them being on your team? You can critique Trevor Lawrence all you want. It won’t bother me. You’re emotional because not everyone is sitting on the tip of the hype wagon. You are posting arguments just to increase post count. You’re being dramatic. Since you’ve /end discussion I wouldn’t normally expect a reply back but with your dramatic you’re being I don’t think you’ll be able to resist. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Varking said:

Yeah he got added to mine as well until after the draft is over. 

Its one thing to post a logical argument for a player, the level of emotional attachment to a draft prospect as a fan is rather ridiculous, as fans we have no control over what will happen over hyping a guy who won't be NFL ready in 2021 based on an underwear workout with no pass rush defense ect is silly.

I also wouldn't mind Lance what I dread is having to listen to the b*thing on here if we draft him because he will ride the pine in 2021 behind Bridgewater.

 

I also realize given my current user name people who haven't read my posts will acuse me of bandwagoning Laurence, I gave up that pipe dream when we won a third game he's a Jaguar.

Edited by TrevorLaurenceTime22
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...