Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers prospect pro day workouts/meetings thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/16/2021 at 8:49 PM, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

Really good kicker, though he fell off a little this past season. Another kicker to watch is Jose Borregales from Miami who won the Lou Groza award as top kicker in 2020. 

With 3 picks in the 6th round, I wouldn't be upset if we took a look at one of these guys. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2021 at 7:08 PM, Basbear said:

 

 But If  Jenkins, Mayfield, or Leatherwood is there at 40, DRAFT THEM!

I agree.  Moton has not signed a long-term contract yet, and his demands could hurt us.  Even if we get a T in the first, it would not hurt you to take one in the second if a stud like Jenkins is sitting there--

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2021 at 12:03 AM, TheProcess said:

Yep, most tackles will be gone in rounds 1 and 2. The only 2 possibilities that may be available in the 3rd round would be James Hudson or Brady Christensen. Hudson is actually very interesting with all of the tools and tons of potential, but he is very raw playing LT. Recruited by Michigan as a DE, struggled and transferred to Cincinnati where he moved to LT. Christensen is strong as a pass protector, but needs to get stronger in run blocking. His pro day results surprised me, especially when he broke the broad jump record for Olinemen by 3 inches.

Moehrig is a talented safety that I have seen ranked as high as 15th as a prospect. I don't see him worth that type of ranking, I actually think that Grant and Holland might be better than Moehrig. I would not be upset getting one of these guys at 73, or a slight move up like we did for Chinn last year. Safeties later on that are intriguing are Wiggins, Washington, Hufanga, and Cisco

You are all over it.  Hudson had some "issue" or something, but I have not heard much else.  Christensen has short arms (under 33") fwiw. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I agree.  Moton has not signed a long-term contract yet, and his demands could hurt us.  Even if we get a T in the first, it would not hurt you to take one in the second if a stud like Jenkins is sitting there--

Word is Moton wants top LT money, thats 23+ million per.......Its been that way for years too. I say tag his ass again in 22, explore trades and either play it out or get some picks. Hes in the top 8 RT, no issues off-field and a great pro. But Im not willing to coming to even 20 million per for Moton. Need to plan for a Moton-less future right now. 

Since 2017, Ive been begging for the panthers to draft 2 OT each year!!! By 2019 I gave up and asked around. Seems the old staff mainly John Matsko viewed every OT after the top 5, as street level talent...... So they never spent a mid-late rounder on OT, nothing to develop "cause current street FAs are just good". Look Im aware that college rules have made it difficult, but you can not give up, thats horse poo. 

Im ALLLLL for adding talented players and first the draft falls to where Sewell is the first and Jenkins is there at 39, DRAFT HIM.(so long no medicals issues). Jenkins can play some OG this year, or be the best insurance. I mean come trade-deadline and panthers are out of it and Some playoff team has a Stanley injury hit.... deal Moton for boat load of picks.. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Word is Moton wants top LT money, thats 23+ million per.......Its been that way for years too. I say tag his ass again in 22, explore trades and either play it out or get some picks. Hes in the top 8 RT, no issues off-field and a great pro. But Im not willing to coming to even 20 million per for Moton. Need to plan for a Moton-less future right now. 

Since 2017, Ive been begging for the panthers to draft 2 OT each year!!! By 2019 I gave up and asked around. Seems the old staff mainly John Matsko viewed every OT after the top 5, as street level talent...... So they never spent a mid-late rounder on OT, nothing to develop "cause current street FAs are just good". Look Im aware that college rules have made it difficult, but you can not give up, thats horse poo. 

Im ALLLLL for adding talented players and first the draft falls to where Sewell is the first and Jenkins is there at 39, DRAFT HIM.(so long no medicals issues). Jenkins can play some OG this year, or be the best insurance. I mean come trade-deadline and panthers are out of it and Some playoff team has a Stanley injury hit.... deal Moton for boat load of picks.. 

If that is the case, then I draft OT in rounds 1 and 2 this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2021 at 11:08 PM, Basbear said:

 

I got 5 LT(one is leatherwood hes 50/50) going in the 1st, the only one left for 40th pick is Dillon Radunz. Hes in that area just too soon for my tastes. I think the best value will be DE/OLBs, bunch of them too. WR should have real high value too, just either spot is high on panthers needs. But If  Jenkins, Mayfield, or Leatherwood is there at 40, DRAFT THEM! I do not care if they also got super lucky and Sewell was drafted 8th, take another one form the group I listed. I believe teams will over draft OT this year, much like CB was drafted last year. 

I don't think Leatherwood will be able to handle the speed rushers in the NFL.

Roche abused him in the Senior Bowl practices and he's, at best, a third round pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...