Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?

Sasquatch

By Sasquatch,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

it isn’t underestimation.

 Just acknowledging what he is and has been of late.   

which is sketchy, attention seeking with political aspirations.  

And it is all running through him via quickly stacked allegations that all read nearly identical. 

and then you factor in Watson’s credibility and earned rep...

which means you got to wait until the facts actually start coming into play before you convict him in the court of public opinion. 

Sure it is. 

Your opinion, nothing more. 

Again, simply your opinion and completely unrelated to his acumen as an attorney. 

Seems logical...

Watson drove his credibility into the ditch over the last 4-6 months with his petulant behaviour.  

It is a fact that 14 formal complaints/lawsuits have been filed.  Within those complaints there are a lot of allegations...

...you are correct that until Watson presents his side of the story no conclusions should be drawn...

...yet you are choosing to besmirch the character of the plaintiffs simply because they chose to hire a (highly capable and successful) lawyer you don't like.  

Question -- do you believe it's possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Sure it is. 

Your opinion, nothing more. 

Again, simply your opinion and completely unrelated to his acumen as an attorney. 

Seems logical...

Watson drove his credibility into the ditch over the last 4-6 months with his petulant behaviour.  

It is a fact that 14 formal complaints/lawsuits have been filed.  Within those complaints there are a lot of allegations...

...you are correct that until Watson presents his side of the story no conclusions should be drawn...

...yet you are choosing to besmirch the character of the plaintiffs simply because they chose to hire a (highly capable and successful) lawyer you don't like.  

Question -- do you believe it's possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

it isn't my opinion that the attorney has political aspirations or that he has committed sketchy acts like creating fake text messages in an attempt to dupe people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

it isn't my opinion that the attorney has political aspirations or that he has committed sketchy acts like creating fake text messages to in an attempt to dupe people. 

Complete horse hockey...

Again, do you believe it is possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete horse hockey...

Again, do you believe it is possible the plaintiffs are telling the truth?

Yes or no?

He literally just ran for public office last election cycle. 

He admitted to using created fake texts as the mayor of Houston was calling on him to be criminally prosecuted.  

I’ve continuously maintained either side could be telling the truth and people need to pump the breaks on judgement 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Please say Watson is guilty because I want to know how you know!

Never said he was guilty but I did say when the accusers hit double digits that is incredibly incriminating especially they all say pretty much the same thing.  They all arent some random instagram models a lot of them are licensed and professional.  So yeah, it aint looking good for him.

But if you have an example of a conspiracy of a lawyer or whoever paying 20 or so women to blatantly lie about someone then by all means post it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

He literally just ran for public office last election cycle. 

He admitted to using created fake texts as the mayor of Houston was calling on him to be criminally prosecuted.  

I’ve continuously maintained either side could be telling the truth and people need to pump the breaks on judgement 

 

 

Give me a scenario where at least 14 women are lying about this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Give me a scenario where at least 14 women are lying about this. 

everything is it's own thing.   How many people have to accuse someone of something before they should just be deemed guilty. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...