Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Also in civil cases there is no presumption whether someone is innocent or guilty. Just whether or not they owe redress. 
 

In which case it’s pretty obvious deshaun owes something. 

That's taking it a bit far. That's what the trial(s) determine.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

He is not entitled to a presumption of innocence. You’re just using words you don’t understand. Unless you know more than like every law review in the country. 

Like literally the first google search from Virginia law review 

The presumption of innocence represents a political and moral consensus that criminal defendants should not be subject to punishment until adjudicated guilty under a strict standard of proof. Although this concept has long been recognized as the hallmark of the criminal law, its potential application to civil proceedings has been largely neglected. Civil defendants enjoy no presumption of innocence. 

In my opinion due process and the presumption of innocence are inextricably linked...

...you are entitled to think otherwise, America is a free country after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:
38 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Also in civil cases there is no presumption whether someone is innocent or guilty. Just whether or not they owe redress. 
 

In which case it’s pretty obvious deshaun owes something. 

That's taking it a bit far. That's what the trial(s) determine.

Agreed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, R2-D2 said:

Lmao moving on to “well I don’t know if this pattern of sexual assault deserves redress” is a hell of a take 

Just skip the entire judicial process  and dish out punishment is a hell of a take.  You aren't making a lick of sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not going to infer whether he’s innocent or guilty but some of you making excuses for men seeking out Instagram models while they’re in relationships tells all about your character and your attachment to athletes when you can justify it to yourself that this level of filth is “OK.”

Edited by WarHeel
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

I’m not going to infer whether he’s innocent or guilty but some of you making excuses for men seeking out Instagram models while they’re in relationships tells all about your character and your attachment to athletes when you can justify it to yourself that this level of filth is “OK.”

Yeah, this coupled with him trying to force his way out of his new contract already doesn't give me great feelings about his character. Though again, it's just my hunch not a verdict.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, electro's horse said:

well every complaint alleges he was just randomly looking for people on instagram and there will presumably be evidence of this but nah all these women are SLUTS DOWN TO GIVE AN OLD FASHIONED

TMZ's sources say Watson didn't find the massage therapists "out of the blue." He reportedly reached out to various friends, teammates and associates to get recommendations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...