Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer talks about Gase (and Tannehill; oh, and Darnold)

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

The same Cam Newton that never put up back-to-back winning seasons?

This is a sad fact we should not shy away from because it continues to haunt this franchise. However it's a strange flex to essentially summarize his accomplishments with that. Do you see anyone saying hey that Luke Kuechly was a hell of a player but he never led his defense to back to back winning seasons? I just don't see what bitterness toward any of those players or even coach Rivera with all the rage posts about him in the past accomplishes now. We had a great run with that group but it is time to put it in the rear view and let go of old feelings and just be thankful for the success we experienced.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yet somehow there are numerous analysts saying they believe Darnold can revolve his career here.

Also, quick tip: the least effective way to convince anyone that you're smart, you're winning, you're cool, etc  is to tell them that you are.

And numerous analyst believe we got hosed on the trade, I’ll take the recent evidence all on my side.

 

Quick tip don’t bring up subjects you are completely wrong on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

The same Cam Newton that never put up back-to-back winning seasons?

He was good, but he wasn't great. He had an excellent defence in 2015 (and a pretty decent offence). 

 

Yes that Cam Newton, who had worse weapons, worse pass protection and worse coaching than Darnold and still was able to put up respectable numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

The question wasn't every three years, it was every year since you had stated a rookie no longer needs two years since they were making the transition easier these days.

Quote me were I specifically said two years 

 

And it is easier today more than ever, are you denying that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, GoobyPls said:

It’s not trying it’s about making you look silly in your own thread

Hurr durr the Browns. Lmao

Nah 😁

For one, I find it hilarious that you still get set off remembering that whole All 22 fiasco.

Plus I think it's pretty well known that you make statements you have no backup for (like claiming to analyze games it's pretty obvious you didn't watch).

But like I said, keep trying. It's at least amusing 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoobyPls Mentor

GoobyPls

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nah 😁

For one, I find it hilarious that you still get set off remembering that whole All 22 fiasco.

Plus I think it's pretty well known that you make statements you have no backup for (like claiming to analyze games it's pretty obvious you didn't watch).

But like I said, keep trying. It's at least amusing 😄

I got you avoiding topics left and right. You are literally bring up stats that back my argument lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

I got you avoiding topics left and right. You are literally bring up stats that back my argument lmao

Not really, but regardless there's actually more interesting things to discuss right now then your latest rant, so... 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • MHS831
      Clowney released

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • tukafan21
      Clowney released

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...