Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer talks about Gase (and Tannehill; oh, and Darnold)


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

The same Cam Newton that never put up back-to-back winning seasons?

This is a sad fact we should not shy away from because it continues to haunt this franchise. However it's a strange flex to essentially summarize his accomplishments with that. Do you see anyone saying hey that Luke Kuechly was a hell of a player but he never led his defense to back to back winning seasons? I just don't see what bitterness toward any of those players or even coach Rivera with all the rage posts about him in the past accomplishes now. We had a great run with that group but it is time to put it in the rear view and let go of old feelings and just be thankful for the success we experienced.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yet somehow there are numerous analysts saying they believe Darnold can revolve his career here.

Also, quick tip: the least effective way to convince anyone that you're smart, you're winning, you're cool, etc  is to tell them that you are.

And numerous analyst believe we got hosed on the trade, I’ll take the recent evidence all on my side.

 

Quick tip don’t bring up subjects you are completely wrong on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

The same Cam Newton that never put up back-to-back winning seasons?

He was good, but he wasn't great. He had an excellent defence in 2015 (and a pretty decent offence). 

 

Yes that Cam Newton, who had worse weapons, worse pass protection and worse coaching than Darnold and still was able to put up respectable numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

The question wasn't every three years, it was every year since you had stated a rookie no longer needs two years since they were making the transition easier these days.

Quote me were I specifically said two years 

 

And it is easier today more than ever, are you denying that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

It’s not trying it’s about making you look silly in your own thread

Hurr durr the Browns. Lmao

Nah 😁

For one, I find it hilarious that you still get set off remembering that whole All 22 fiasco.

Plus I think it's pretty well known that you make statements you have no backup for (like claiming to analyze games it's pretty obvious you didn't watch).

But like I said, keep trying. It's at least amusing 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nah 😁

For one, I find it hilarious that you still get set off remembering that whole All 22 fiasco.

Plus I think it's pretty well known that you make statements you have no backup for (like claiming to analyze games it's pretty obvious you didn't watch).

But like I said, keep trying. It's at least amusing 😄

I got you avoiding topics left and right. You are literally bring up stats that back my argument lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

I got you avoiding topics left and right. You are literally bring up stats that back my argument lmao

Not really, but regardless there's actually more interesting things to discuss right now then your latest rant, so... 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...