Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't want Penei round 1


CarForLife
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Varking said:

There’s plenty of every position in the draft. If you think he’s the best of what’s available you don’t hesitate to take him. 
 

He’s a stud. 

exactly. After QB, I think LT is the most important position on the field, followed by DE/CB. That's why they cost the most in FA. That 5th year option is very important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Maybe he'll give us Washington's 1st for our 2nd to trade up for the another Little. 

WFT's 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for #39, which he uses on Aaron Banks, the 5th best LG in the draft that he immediately plans to move to LT. Genius!!

BTW, when TF are they going to get a name?? It's been over a year already. They should call themselves the no-congressional term limits, that's the scariest thing in DC that I can think of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhhhhhhh, the hope I had for my hog mollie, 2ton road grader Jeff Otah. Them knees on the big guys, they worry me. Gotta see if they can hold up in the NFL.

I think at #8 you've got to pick a star. A dominant scorer or a dominant score stopper. That's a really high pick. There's value throughout this draft at OL and QB.

I'm OK with BPA THIS year at #8, pick up an OL/QB in the second, good ones will still be there.

*OFFICIAL KYLE TRASK 2021 BANDWAGON MEMBER*

 

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, top dawg said:

I don't think it's unrealistic to expect a starter in the second round in general, much less the top of the second or end of the first. 

When people say it's a "deep draft" at a particular position, they are talking about guys who have a good shot at turning into starters.

Agree.  #39 SHOULD be considered a starter from day 1, unless we draft a project QB that we plan to sit for a while to learn, which is an option. Since I've chosen to consider Darnold a rookie project QB, I hope we come away from round 2 with a starter at LT and CB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...