Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Source: Panthers Open to Drafting Quarterback With No. 8 Pick


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Verge said:

I wouldn't rule out Jaylen Waddle either. 

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobcat91 said:

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

The depth at OT this year is bonkers. I would prefer OT at 8 myself, but the reasoning behind drafting a weapon or QB at 8 would be that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobcat91 said:

 

Our OL is still garbage. Thats the mind blowing aspect of this. We watched Cam go from an incredible talent to a nonfunctional QB due to garbage OL. I dont want a QB, WR, TE,CB, etc until we spend our first few picks on OL. Rhule is not an idiot and was an NFL OL coach. He sees this dumpster fire and as much as folks here want shiny things, I want in your face road grading animals that open holes and run the Chase Youngs of the world into Winston-Salem. Dont be stupid. 

I agree, but maybe the think the drop off from Slater (Sewell probably won’t be there at 8...) and the round 2 LTs isn’t as big as from Chase/Waddle/Smith and the next tier of WRs. Not saying it’s right, but that could be a thought process...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

The depth at OT this year is bonkers. I would prefer OT at 8 myself, but the reasoning behind drafting a weapon or QB at 8 would be that. 

Will we be able to get another pick for Teddy or we will ultimately have to cut him? An extra fourth or fifth this year could be nice in an excellent Oline draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

After quarterbacks go in the top three picks, the draft will begin in earnest when the Falcons go on the clock at No. 4.

Should Atlanta take Pitts, as many around the league anticipate, and Cincinnati take Chase at No. 5, it’s not hard to envision the Dolphins getting some sweet offers to move out of the sixth spot. The Broncos (who pick ninth) need a quarterback. Perhaps they would be willing to part with a second-rounder to move up three spots to get one.

https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nfl/miami-dolphins/article250605514.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I agree, but maybe the think the drop off from Slater (Sewell probably won’t be there at 8...) and the round 2 LTs isn’t as big as from Chase/Waddle/Smith and the next tier of WRs. Not saying it’s right, but that could be a thought process...

Pretty sure the Panthers like Slater better anyway

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The aversion to tying up too much money in the ground game when it’s what’s winning us games is crazy to me. I get letting Rico walk if you think he’s easily replaceable but I don’t see many people arguing that, just applying an arbitrary salary cap based on what we think RBs are currently worth. I’d rather be stuck with Hubbard as an overpaid backup (not the worst one to have, mind you) than lose out on the most productive player on the offense personally.
    • Why do people keep saying things like “it’s not Young’s fault we spent so much to draft him”? Who cares if it’s his fault?  Nobody is saying send him to jail or anything.  People aren’t talking about blame for the decision to draft him, they’re talking about how bad he is as a QB and how we’d be much better with even an average QB.  Pointing out that we sunk a lot of resources into drafting him isn’t invalidated because he didn’t make that decision himself. Doesn’t matter whose fault that was, he’s still not playing like a QB who was drafted at all, much less one that cost two firsts, two seconds and a #1 WR. 
    • Might wanna edit your post https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/01/13/rams-vikings-live-score-updates-nfl-playoffs/77665954007/
×
×
  • Create New...