Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Carolina Panther 8 player Big Board


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, jamos14 said:

1. Lawrence

2. Wilson

3. Sewell

4. Pitts

5. Fields

6. Chase

I'm trading down if none of these guys are available.

 

Interesting--was waiting to see one that did not reach the top--in my book, there are 4qbs and 3 elite-generational talents---but my emotions put an eighth one in there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

After Darnold

 

1. Sunshine

2. Sewell

3. Pitts

4. Chase

5. Wilson

6. Waddle

7. Kwity Paye

8. Lance

9. Slater

10. Darrisaw

 

Missed the cut- Sustain, Smith, AVT, JOK

2-4 all are .01% difference

 

 Yes--2-4 are elite. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

If he fell to 8 there would be something seriously wrong with him.

Sshh. On April 28, I am going to Redit and tell everyone that he was once a woman then had surgery to come back for the prom because he already had a date and purchased a dress then started to have another surgery to revert back but forgot what gender he is so he is conflicted.drop stock GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Sshh. On April 28, I am going to Redit and tell everyone that he was once a woman then had surgery to come back for the prom because he already had a date and purchased a dress then started to have another surgery to revert back but forgot what gender he is so he is conflicted.drop stock GIF

That might scare off a couple of the older owners.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waddle has had an amazing college career and would be fun to watch here- but I can’t help being reminded of Ted Ginn having a similar college career and being drafted in the top 10 by Miami...... Very talented but limited impact as a pro.

This is where positional value affects my thinking.

We always assume these top guys are “can’t miss” yet many of them do. I think Jimmy Johnson liked to have extra picks to increase his chances of hitting on players, plus, we need a lot more players.

I would be ok with trading back to increase our number of top 50 picks or even get a 1st in 22.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, section543 said:

Waddle has had an amazing college career and would be fun to watch here- but I can’t help being reminded of Ted Ginn having a similar college career and being drafted in the top 10 by Miami...... Very talented but limited impact as a pro.

This is where positional value affects my thinking.

We always assume these top guys are “can’t miss” yet many of them do. I think Jimmy Johnson liked to have extra picks to increase his chances of hitting on players, plus, we need a lot more players.

I would be ok with trading back to increase our number of top 50 picks or even get a 1st in 22.

There is always that one player that you remember that shows us how stupid we are about the transition from college to pros.  Not just us---the GMs and scouts.  I mean, they weigh them, interview them, watch hours of film, and they make them run drills, jump high and far, lift weights, take tests, and the success rate for first rounders is about 55%?

Why go through that much trouble?  Flip a damn coin.

Waddle was the slot WR with 2 pretty good WRs on the outside.  He can scat, for sure.  Here, the situation will be pretty similar.  So maybe there is something there.

I look at positional value, and a LT is worth far more than a slot WR.   So for me, it is a no brainer--I hope he is gone before we pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are taking a pass catcher and Pitts is there that is a no brainer to me. You can say he's just a TE all day long but some of the best weapons(ESPECIALLY in the red zone) in the league play that position and we have nothing there. I doubt he is there though

 

Otherwise go o-line/ secondary rest of draft lol

1. Lawrence

2. Wilson

3. Fields

4. Pitts

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Lance

8. Parsons

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That argument could be used for actual trolls. “If you don’t like it find somewhere else to post” is just silly. Some of us are just letting you know, you are sounding like a broken record on these threads. It’s just some constructive criticism. You don’t have to change your ways. I doubt you will. Just wanted to make sure you were aware. Feel free to deflect and use one of those GIFs again. 
    • It went from he has to jump to he has to bend his hips. That’s changing it. I showed you clips of him throwing deep without jumping which means he doesn’t always have to. I liked and like Stroud better so I’m not really a Bryce defender. Just think you don’t have to make up things when critiquing our QB like he has to jump to throw it deep. There is plenty of ammo there without those exaggerations. Oh yeah the “you don’t know ball” argument. Classic. 
    • I get the rookie QB formula and fully expected to see it implemented. Oh well. For the run game there was no or very little under center stuff until a good ways into the year. At least that is how I am remembering it. And no deep throwing - so stacked boxes which you can say chicken or egg on why.  Hard to run like that.  The QB that people said was so great was pulled for a designated Hail Mary thrower. That’s pretty unusual. And may speak to why we saw few deep balls in some part, along with the OL. To ignore that stuff means you aren’t working with all of the information when you try to mentally model or project what it might be like on the field.  Me, I have a slice of hope that he could maybe be NFL average but getting him to be a plus type of QB is a huge job. It depends on designing the playbook with certain values at the foundation that have to be adhered to first . You have to integrate the other pieces around this one guy’s skill set because he is a real outlier. And he has to learn the under center skill set. Maybe put that Only Positive thread back up people can go there if they don’t want to deal with rightly frustrated fans. 
×
×
  • Create New...