Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You Really Against Fields or Lance if they fall to #8...


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But its rooted in fact and speculation

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance reminds me of mahomes but when someone becomes a star they always look for the next mahomes but there is only one so I got lance as a bust I love darnold and will sacrifice 3 years to see if he can live up to the hype . At right now it’s like we drafted a top 5 qb in darnold he’s basically a rookie . We need Sewell if he’s there slater is overrated. Take best player it would be a land slide if pitts falls but that’s great but how does one pan out taking a tight end early big tisk risk look at oj Howard .idk who I want Idk for the first time who we get but I love surprises and who ever we get I’ll be happy and excited for all the summer posts of him in training camp .

I can’t wait keep pounding it’s going to be a great show come draft day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:
Trey Lance will go #4 overall regardless of what team owns the pick. Falcons, Broncos, WFT, or Patriots.

 

45 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

 

 

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

I like lance.  I think he will be there at 8.  However he is a long long way from being a nfl starter.  That's not really debatable.  I also think rhule and Co either didn't like what they saw or didn't want a huge project at pick 8.  Maybe both.   

 

From what I heard and read this past week it sounds like fields is going to be dropping.  Lots of noise about his throwing motion and slow going through progressions.   Listen to Chris simms break him down on the ringer podcast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

That wasn't opening day of offseason training either.  Again, they were there for the first one, that should be enough.  Not everyone had a second Pro Day, actually, nearly all prospects don't.

If they were interested they would have used that opportunity.  Don't kid yourself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...