Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Intrigued by Fields

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

We need a good qb and a good line. Quit with this simpleton approach of its gotta be this before that. 

You may not realize this, but the draft doesn't actually allow you to pick two players at once.

When the time comes the team is going to have to prioritize one player over another (all others, in fact).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You may not realize this, but the draft doesn't actually allow you to pick two players at once.

When the time comes the team is going to have to prioritize one player over another (all others, in fact).

He is saying you can’t go into thinking we HAVE to have this position BEFORE we draft this. BPA is the best way to go while knowing that QB and LT are both still considered needs (along with several other positions). Maybe we have Sewell over Fields, but Fields over Slater. It all just depends on who we like and who is available.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

T R A D E

B A C K

W I T H

P A T S

O R

W F T

O R

P I T T S B U R G H

whew boy, Pittsburgh is waaaaay back at 24. They'd have to bring a hellova offer. I'm still waiting for Miami to get cute with that #18 pick. They have 2 in the 1st and 2 in the 2nd. They could surround Tua with 2 top 10 weapons, and still have another top 50 pick. We could have #18, #36, and #39.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Maybe but there are a lot of guys out there breaking fields down and seeing the same thing.   If he was a slam dunk we would have moved to 3

Unless SF have their heads so far up their owns asses they can't see (a very probable situation), Fields WILL go at #3. 1 person says that SF is in love with Jones, and every other talking head regurgitates it for clicks. 

FWIW, I'm all in on LT or CB even if fields is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Unless SF have their heads so far up their owns asses they can't see (a very probable situation), Fields WILL go at #3. 1 person says that SF is in love with Jones, and every other talking head regurgitates it for clicks. 

FWIW, I'm all in on LT or CB even if fields is available.

Wait are we allowed to draft a CB with a need still at LT? Asking for a friend...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I tend to prefer my LT to be around 7'3", over 375 lbs and usually at least 42" arm length. I do like at least a 12" hand, as well. 

It helps a lot for picking up DE's by the scruff of their neck and then tossing them at a DT.

Foucault!

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

New wrinkle in the Fields saga...

Don't necessarily expect it to mean much, but it's a story.

 

That can be a scary illnesss to have. Hopefully he will outgrow it like predicted. Makes you also wonder what happens if/when he gets a concussion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...