Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st Round Draft Pick for the Panthers


kungfoodude
 Share

First Round Draft Pick Prediction  

131 members have voted

  1. 1. Choose the outcome.

    • Stand Pat and draft a QB.
      15
    • Stand Pat and draft an OT.
      66
    • Stand Pat and draft a TE.
      4
    • Stand Pat and draft a WR
      2
    • Stand Pat and draft another position.
      1
    • Trade up and draft a QB.
      1
    • Trade up and draft another player.
      0
    • Trade down and draft an OT.
      31
    • Trade down and draft a CB.
      8
    • Trade down and draft a QB
      0
    • Trade down and draft another player.
      3
    • Trade out of the first round entirely.
      0


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

The almost 83% total for OT is pretty amazing. I am not sure we have seen that kind of consensus among Panthers/Huddle fans for a draft.

I think every single poster on this board wanted Star the year we drafted him and KK. We had been on the Star train since mid season almost unanimously I feel like. But yeah, otherwise I agree. It’s rare.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

Dang i seen lots of bad draft comments for months and I didnt have any hope for huddle to make the right choice. Im surprised, good work huddle!

Well, this isn't "what we want" it is "what will the Panthers do."

I suppose the conventional wisdom is tilted OT at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Going for the outlier possibility? I like it 

Have him sit for the year and learn. Then hope Donaldson balls out and get a few first rounders for Donaldson next year after we puck up his option. 

 

Fields is a once in a decade QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

Have him sit for the year and learn. Then hope Donaldson balls out and get a few first rounders for Donaldson next year after we puck up his option. 

 

Fields is a once in a decade QB. 

I am okay with having two good QB's. I am DEFINITELY okay with having a Darnold back up plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...