Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting 1st RD mock firm bleacher report


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

OK, according to the link, Miami traded #6 to Dallas for #10, then traded #10 to us for #8, which we traded to philly for #12. Clear as mud! I've thought about the idea of trading for miami's # 18, & 36, so that was my first thought here, It's a bit convoluted. 

And also, why the fug do we see Slater as a guard when everyone else in the world sees him as the #2 LT available? That's even harder to understand.

I think Slater is a LT as well but the author is simply stating what more than one evaluator has said.  It’s probably a 65% to 35% split with LT being the majority selection

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

read the full link, that might help

I found his take to be possible and probable based on the trade up to Atlanta for number 4     That changes everything and realistically, Fitterer will not go lower than 12 to 15 range 

not  directed at you but some people on here bitch if you just give a link, some bitch if you give just the text or too much text , some bitch if you give both andsome just like to criticize to prove how much smarter they think they are than others  and today is one of those days in which I have no patience for it 

I shared this because the author is someone who gives really good positional breakdowns with film justification when he is evaluating players and game outcomes 

 

 

Thats fair. 

I do like the idea of trading down and staying in the top half of the 1st round still. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

So Miami just sent Philly a 2022 1st to move up to 6. You really think that Miami is going to again, send another future 1st to move up to 8th (in this mock)? That would have Miami giving up a total of three 1st rounder just for Jamarr Chase. 

total hypothetical but if the draft falls like this...

4. Pitts, 5.Chase, 6.(Mia) Sewell, 7. Smith or a QB 8. they could want Waddle or Smith and landing Sewell and Waddle/Smith in this draft is worth whatever compensation, for that team in it's current state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

That’s not what I’m arguing about. Im arguing about the trade that happened in the article/mock. Miami had already traded down from 3 to 12 (SF) and then gave Philly next year’s 1st to get to 6. They’re not going to trade down with a division rival (Cowboys’ 10) and then have to send another future 1st to us (Carolina) in order to get to 8 for Chase. That would be a total of three 1st rounders for just a receiver. If Miami wants Chase, they’re taking him at 6 or trading down to 8 and taking him. Not trading down further to just trade back up to take someone. They already positioned themselves that same way of moving down to move back up with SF and philly.

I didnt read that article but I suggested in another thread that Miami could want to trade back up and you and someone else were pretty adamant that it wasnt possible, so I just stated my hypothetical(here) that I thought of in that thread in which I should have replied there but didnt find it worthwhile at the time but then this was suggested and i wasted about 4 minutes replying to these two quotes. But cool, Miami definitely wont trade up from 18, gotcha, even tho they are still ahead from the Houston/SF trades and are desperate for weapons and Sewell and Waddle wouldnt be a hell of a draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

This thread does not bode well for the huddle's reading comprehension. Thanks for sharing the article @raleigh-pantherI think the draft may play out to something similiar to this.
 

Im Out GIF

Thank you

there are many different points of view of what will happen 

the lynchpin, unfortunately, is Atlanta 

if any  team benefits if fields falls, it’s them

i don’t begin to know.  

I hope for the best seeing how I put my money and time where my mouth is by choice with this team.

nothing like NFL Sunday in the stadium.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...