Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer also has us taking Fields, believes Tepper is pushing for it.


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

“Smokescreens aren’t as common as people think” 

You have literally taken quotes from the same conference stating they are confident in him. A quote comes up that doesn’t fit your narrative.... must be bluffing for draft season. Sorry but you can’t have it both ways. 

I recognize that anything is possible. Have said repeatedly that I don't know what's going to happen.

I'm actually guaranteed to be right about this because, well...I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we hadn't already traded for a starter, I'd be completely on board with him.

Of course, if that were the situation, he probably wouldn't fall to us because that's just how things go in Pantherland 😕

Personally, I would love to go into next season with two potential starters.  I have been watching football long enough to realize that if we depend on a draftee like Fields or someone we traded for like Darnold being the guy, the odds aren't good.  But with two guys, the odds are better.  I wouldn't do it with any other position, but qb is important enough to risk tying up additional draft capital.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Personally, I would love gto go into next season with two potential starters.  I have been watching football long enough to realize that if we depend on a draftee like Fields or someone we traded for like Darnold being the guy, the odds aren't good.  But with two guys, the odds are better.  I wouldn't do it with any other position, but qb is important enough to risk tying up additional draft capital.  

Not a fan of the old saying that if you've got two quarterbacks, you've got no quarterback, I take it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Not a fan of the old saying that if you've got two quarterbacks, you've got no quarterback, I take it?

Depends on how we look at.  I wouldn't keep two qb's for a long time, but imo, we give them a year or two, then decide which one is best and get rid of the other one, ala San Diego when they had Rivers and Brees.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

Do the Panthers have a legit starting QB on their roster they believe can help them achieve their goals?  It's that simple.  

And that answer is maybe. We just don't know what they think of Sam. Guess we'll find out tomorrow if a QB falls to them.

If they pass of Fields or whoever at 8, take a tackle or whatever or trade back, and then take Mond, Trask, or some other QB in the second or later rounds, this place will explode.

For the record, if they don't take one early, I think the Panthers will take a QB in the mid rounds since the GM has stated he likes taking a QB during those rounds to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Didn't JR push the Cam pick? That worked out well.

Not really.

Oddly enough, the guy who was the biggest advocate for Newton behind the scenes wound up being the guy that wound up with a non-disclosure agreement thanks to Richardson using a racial slur on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

And that answer is maybe. We just don't know what they think of Sam. Guess we'll find out tomorrow if a QB falls to them.

If they pass of Fields or whoever at 8, take a tackle or whatever or trade back, and then take Mond, Trask, or some other QB in the second or later rounds, this place will explode.

For the record, if they don't take one early, I think the Panthers will take a QB in the mid rounds since the GM has stated he likes taking a QB during those rounds to develop.

I wouldn’t mind Mills or Newman, but it would need to be 5th round or later (don’t see Mills lasting that long).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...