Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Total cost for Teddy


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks like we are going to eat $7m of Teddy's contract this year.

 

That would bring the total cost for 1 year of Teddy to $31m.  $8m in 2020 salary, $1m in workout and game bonuses.  $15m signing bonus.  $7m of guaranteed salary this year we are turning into another bonus.

Teddy Bridgewater Contract Details, Salary Cap Charges, Bonus Money, and Contract History | Over The Cap

Also we lost a 3rd, from missing out on a comp pick, but we did get a 6th back.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but fair to say it was a terrible decision.

 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entirely disagree. 

No deal:

We pay Teddy $21 mil 2021, still on the books for 2022

With a post-J1 cut:

2021: $15 mil dead cap, clear $7.9 mil in cap space

2022: $5 mil dead cap and we’ve got $21 mil more to spend.

With deal:

2021: Gain 6th rounder, gain $6 mil in cap (yes though more dead cap is eaten that was GOING TO HIM ANYWAYS)

2022: $26 mil freed

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, davos said:

Entirely disagree. 

No deal:

We pay Teddy $21 mil 2021, still on the books for 2022

With a post-J1 cut:

2021: $15 mil dead cap, clear $7.9 mil in cap space

2022: $5 mil dead cap and we’ve got $21 mil more to spend.

With deal:

2021: Gain 6th rounder, gain $6 mil in cap (yes though more dead cap is eaten that was GOING TO HIM ANYWAYS)

2022: $26 mil freed

There is nothing to disagree with, you are looking at cap space relative to what would have been his cap cost for this year and next if he would have stayed on the team.

My post is stating how much we paid him for his one year of play.  If we are really responsible for $7m this year we will spend $31m for his one year of play.  $24m has already been paid to him, and it looks like we will have to pay him $7m more.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Hindsight is always 20/20 but fair to say it was a terrible decision.

Signing Teddy in the first place and how he performed was a bad deal. The trade to Denver is a good deal. We have paid Teddy way to much for how he performed. 

I hope he does well in Denver and wish him the best but I am glad he is gone.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

Oh I misread, if you're saying this being his total cost for his panthers' stay then yep, totally agree.  Thought you were saying the trade was misguided.

Nope, the trade makes sense, and we will save a little bit of money.

Looks to be a good trade for Denver, if his salary is only $3m this year.

Also looks like this 2022 salary voided as part of the deal according to www.spotrac.com .  That might mean if he walks they might get a comp pick for him.

Teddy Bridgewater Contract Breakdowns, Salary Cap Figures, Salaries, Bonuses | Spotrac

They gave up a 6th round pick for Teddy at $3m and they might get a better pick back if he walks.  That is how you do a "bridge" QB.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Short has no business still being on there. That was the no brainer of all no brainers last year. I can at least excuse Teddy if they actually thought he’d be good but Short made no sense at all because he wasn’t close to worth the extra $13M.

going to be interesting on here when we cant complain about dead cap anymore.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

It will be nice. You always have dead cap (most of it is built into overall cap hits), but Marty was truly impressive. $30M of our $39M in 2021 dead cap was from people signed in 2020 or not cut in 2020. I mean that’s just awful decision making when you are cutting people 1 year after signing them to starter deals and do it multiple times every year.

yeah deadcap was pretty consistent and cancerous here. Im excited to see what the team will do with a cap where 85% + is available to be utilized. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...