Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Round One, Game 5


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

NEVERMIND WTF THATS A HORRID CALL

Preds fan here (and Canes fan 2nd...used to live across the street from PNC).

Letter of the law, that's interference because he's in the crease.  But spirit of the law, Josi was in Saros' way too.

Tough break.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

Preds fan here (and Canes fan 2nd...used to live across the street from PNC).

Letter of the law, that's interference because he's in the crease.  But spirit of the law, Josi was in Saros' way too.

Tough break.

Don't know why I'm getting pooed when I agreed that shouldn't be interference...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CanePantherHornet said:

Why in the fug are these referees so biased towards the Predators? Is there something I'm missing?

 

League hates us. Young upstarts, the Storm Surge, bunch of jerks. Canes winning doesn't help the league grow in popularity. They want a larger franchise winning it. Canes winning puts that in jeopardy because we historically fair well when we get in the playoffs.

 

That's my conspiracy theory thought. Realistically, the refs are screwing Rod for speaking up about the officiating being biased the other night.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

At least since we are done in this playoffs we have the young core. We have to just get there eventually 

 

We're in a tied series, down a goal in the second period. literally not catching breaks. This poo ain't over.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lightsout said:

Realistically, the refs are screwing Rod for speaking up about the officiating being biased the other night.

This!

The NHL refs have shown time and again that they believe they are above reproach. It is a joke how few calls get overturned on review leaguewide. Especially when coaches never challenge unless it is blatantly obvious. The few calls that actually get overturned are probably retaliation by the refs for some previous slight. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...