Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?

SBBlue

By SBBlue,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Brett began his career with 3 straight winning seasons as a starting QB...there is nothing "bad" about that. 

Is Sam injury prone?

Must of had a great team because his stats and rating was on par with Sam on year 3. The Golden Calf of Bristol took his team to the playoffs as a starting QB and won on the road on the playoffs. Must be good. Teddy was 5-0 as a Saints starter. Must be good. Taysum Hill has a winning record as a starting QB, so why are they not starting him? Is Sean Payton not smart enough to realize a winning record is what makes a QB good? See wins are the sign of a good TEAM. Troy Aiken also had a losing record after year 3. Started off 1-15, that’s Clausen bad! 19-29 after year 3. Sound have cut his ass right?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Must of had a great team because his stats and rating was on par with Sam on year 3. The Golden Calf of Bristol took his team to the playoffs as a starting QB and won on the road on the playoffs. Must be good. Teddy was 5-0 as a Saints starter. Must be good. Taysum Hill has a winning record as a starting QB, so why are they not starting him? Is Sean Payton not smart enough to realize a winning record is what makes a QB good? See wins are the sign of a good TEAM. Troy Aiken also had a losing record after year 3. Started off 1-15, that’s Clausen bad! 19-29 after year 3. Sound have cut his ass right?

OK so the next Brett Favre is now in the fold...

...you heard it here first folks!

{big toke from the bong of hope}

 

FB36FAE1-B010-4014-B818-95C2E2AD6ED4.jpeg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

OK so the next Brett Favre is now in the fold...

...you heard it here first folks!

{big toke from the bong of hope}

 

FB36FAE1-B010-4014-B818-95C2E2AD6ED4.jpeg

Ahhh so you have no response. Perfect. You wanted some examples I gave you some. Can’t help it if it didn’t line up with your trolling. 
Ask for data. Receive data. Try to change data. Then give up and mock the other person. Well done! Nice debate. Go study the Appaloosa Model some more, it’s the only thing you know because no one else cares enough about it to fact check you on it.

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ahhh so you have no response. Perfect. You wanted some examples I gave you some. Can’t help it if it didn’t line up with your trolling. 
Ask for data. Receive data. Try to change data. Then give up and mock the other person. Well done! Nice debate. Go study the Appaloosa Model some more, it’s the only thing you know because no one else cares enough about it to fact check you on it.

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

Favre ain't it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

 

Favre ain't it. 

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

 

Favre ain't it. 

He looked just as bad his first 3 years as several QBs including the great Brett Favre. The Jets franchise trading him has no relevance other than adding one more asterisk so you can exclude him from this list. Had we found someone else you would just add another like “in the last 10 years” or “for a future 2nd.” So plenty of QBs have been where he is at and turned it around. Take your trolling someone else. Honestly I’m not even saying he will turn it around, I’m just annoyed at posters who come on here just to talk down about this team. At least some of the others are actually good at it though and have actual data to back it up. You just tried and failed pretty bad....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

Because it’s the extra bit of info needed to try to prove his point no matter how irrelevant it is. They also need to have been drafted on an even year during a leap year. See it’s never happened before therefore it can never happen!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, SBBlue said:

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

What is the Darnold bull-case predicated on?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 5/26/2021 at 4:15 PM, glenwo2 said:

Also, the fact that he managed to finish out his last 2 seasons with More TDs than INTs still, is a testament to his talent.

In fact, in his "best" season as a Jet, he had 2 games where he threw a bunch of INTs.   Take away those two games and he'd have been 17 TDs and 6 (yes...SIX!) INTs.   

In the ghost game, the pats ran cover 0 blitz over and over and the jets couldn't handle it....five interceptions.

The Patriots made Sam Darnold and Patrick Mahomes see ghosts with the exact same blitz - YouTube

 

In 2020, on 68.9% of his dropbacks, he wasn’t even blitzed. That means defenses were getting to him without sending extra defenders leaving LB's back for coverage.

 

 

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fieryprophet
      DJ Moore. The quitting WR

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      This play was never designed to go to either DJ or Odunze. The primary read is Burden who is stymied early, with the outlet being Kmet if Caleb doesn't like the option for Burden. Given the situation it's pretty obvious the simple play is to take the free yards with Kmet, or if you want to be aggressive just wait a beat longer for Burden to uncover on his double move. If Moore was ever going to be a viable target in this play then Caleb should have started out reading Odunze to hold the safety in the middle and then coming to Moore, but because he started the snap staring down the right and then came back to the middle late it made it where the safety's leverage remained to the outside of Moore, so he would never have imagined that pass actually being thrown to him in that situation. Realistically DJ's best option in that context is to just occupy the safety to leave a hole open for Caleb to get it to Burden, which is probably why he throttles down vs carrying the safety across.
    • panfanman
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By panfanman · Posted

      Even with Sonny Styles still on the board I thought it's a no brainer to address the Oline after Icky's injury.  And how can you pass up Fano at 19 given our situation. Then the rest of the draft just kind of made sense with maybe the exception of Klubnik.  But if Canales can fix him and Young goes down. . .I think it's a solid pick. What do you think of this draft?
    • Zaximus
      Bucky Brooks eats humble pie. You want a couple of slices?

      By Zaximus · Posted

      When we didn't trade him to the Rams or the Bears (I believe the Bears said they would take one of Brown/ Burns/DJ Moore) we should have just signed him and kept him.  We should have traded him to the Rams obviously and we should have kept DJ and traded Burns.  We made all three wrong choices with Burns lol.
×
×
  • Create New...