Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“I hate saying it. But the Panthers played with 10 guys on D last year”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

There was actually a report that Fields was the only QB we would take at 8. I would take that as Fields over Lance and Mac. 

Given that he was available at eight and we didn't take him, I'd day that "report" smells like bullsh-t. 

The more reliable report was actually that the only quarterbacks we liked were Lawrence and Wilson. 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

There was actually a report that Fields was the only QB we would take at 8. I would take that as Fields over Lance and Mac. 

Well, that report was clearly wrong. There's lots of "reports" leading up to the draft. A lot of them prove to be wrong.

I wanted Fields too. The Panthers' didn't. It is what it is. I just hope we made the right call. Time will tell.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

Having good to great linebackers have gotten us to the Super Bowl twice. We didn’t win it all not because of the linebackers but because of cheaters and bad coaching not being able to make adjustments. We could’ve used the money we gave Elflein, Erving and Perryman to help get a Shaq Griffin and then take Parsons. Instead we have three players that might not even see the field much at the end of the day because they’re either injury proned or just an average player. 

Having good to great LBs has gotten us a losing overall record. We've way over-invested at the position historically and that has created talent deficits at other more vital positions.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t know what the hell you guys are talking about, I wanted Fields but I like the potential of Darnold too. No problem with it.

I don’t care if Carter had a good camp.

But I’ll answer the question for you. A couple, reasonable, quality 4-3 LBs alongside Shaq will be 12-15m. with Shaqs contract next year that’ll be 32-35 million of the cap going to LBs, or roughly 15-18%. And even more after next year. It’s not going to work.

Just rough numbers of course but that to me, is an issue. That’s all I’m saying. Don’t expect much better than Whitehead with Shaq’s contract unless the Panthers devote an unreasonable and possibly detrimental amount of cap to LBs. Again, that is all I was saying. How is this such a wild statement?

But feel free to continue to bash my opinion for taking a thread about a Panthers LB and relating it to another Panthers LB and LB position in general, by inaccurately referring to how I wanted a QB in the draft and am butthurt. Makes sense.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Having good to great LBs has gotten us a losing overall record. We've way over-invested at the position historically and that has created talent deficits at other more vital positions.

Exactly what I’m getting at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

If Darnold sucks, I guess it wouldn’t matter who is playing middle linebacker. It’ll show how poor Rhule is at grading quarterbacks.

 

And if Sam balls out. It will show just how little you know about evaluating QBs. I'm rooting for Sam even harder now.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, My Life Dont Matter said:

We wanted Fields. The only guys that didn’t know that are you and the other two guys that came at my throat like I didn’t know what I was talking about. It sucks to get proven wrong. I understand it. Back to the main topic, the only reason why we passed up on Fields is because Rhule is an idiot and is putting his life on the line for Darnold just like how he did for Teddy last year. Any other coaches would’ve went with Fields. 

You're delusional and illogical. We did not want Fields. The only argument I need is that Fields was there and we didn't draft him. Linking reports that proved to be wrong doesn't make you right.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

 

 

I got it right here for you guys who are blowing smoke about the Panthers not wanting Fields. Starts at the 44 second mark. You guys are embarrassing.

Lol arguing something that didn’t happen and he was available when we picked. Dude your real dumb lol!

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, My Life Dont Matter said:

Any other coaches would’ve went with Fields. 

Like Vic Fangio?  I would’ve loved Fields, I think he’ll be great, but numerous teams passed on him.  It’s not like “any other coach” would’ve drafted him, because they simply didn’t do it when it was actually draft time.  
 

on topic to the thread, it’s no coincidence that we shut out the Lions  and it was Whitehead’s first game being out.  He was very, very bad.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
    • I mean, first of all, I'm not the one who initially said he was a life long fan, it was in that tweet in the OP. But more importantly, "life long fan" is a relative term, especially for a franchise like the Panthers.  I think anyone who was say, 10-12 or younger when the franchise started, and been a fan since the start, could claim to be a life long fan. I'm 38, been a fan of the team since year 1 even though I'm not even from the Carolinas, after almost 30 years of fandom and following them since the beginning, I have no issue saying I'm a life long Panthers fan. Very possible his dad is say around 40 years old and been a Panthers fan since the start.  And even if he's a little older, if you're a fan of a team for 30 out of your say 45ish years of life... that's "life long" in that instance.
×
×
  • Create New...