Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is "My Life Dont Matter" actually Chuck?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

In his case, most likely. 

I mean, there is likely not a real way to determine what he actually believes. He is just here to create mayhem and entertain himself, like any troll is really. 

I wouldn't be shocked by just about anything he said. 

It's frequently up for debate whether somebody is just trolling or they're legitimately that stupid.

Given the Chuck all too often winds up descending into furious rants that get him banned, I'm inclined to believe he probably really is that dumb.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's frequently up for debate whether somebody is just trolling or they're legitimately that stupid.

Given the Chuck all too often winds up descending into furious rants that get him banned, I'm inclined to believe he probably really is that dumb.

I am not sure there is a more clear example of a troll than Chuck. He may be somewhat unsophisticated in his tactics to avoid detection but he appears to be pretty clearly trolling. Now, are his actual opinions and believes somewhat mixed into the bunch? Undoubtedly, but he is VERY clearly trolling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not sure there is a more clear example of a troll than Chuck. He may be somewhat unsophisticated in his tactics to avoid detection but he appears to be pretty clearly trolling. Now, are his actual opinions and believes somewhat mixed into the bunch? Undoubtedly, but he is VERY clearly trolling. 

Even accepting that premise, it doesn't really preclude him from being genuinely stupid, though.

Hell, putting that much effort into annoying people doesn't exactly speak of having an especially good life offline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Even accepting that premise, it doesn't really preclude him from being genuinely stupid, though.

Hell, putting that much effort into annoying people doesn't exactly speak of having an especially good life offline.

I don't presume to know anything about him other than what he does on here. 

The fact that he is getting under your skin pretty much makes him successful at what he is doing. It's really just best to either ignore him or not take anything he says seriously. Once you know he is trolling, it's extremely simple to deal with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't presume to know anything about him other than what he does on here. 

The fact that he is getting under your skin pretty much makes him successful at what he is doing. It's really just best to either ignore him or not take anything he says seriously. Once you know he is trolling, it's extremely simple to deal with. 

Not under my skin. I just have a tendency to call out stupid when I see it.

Mods probably wish I did less of that, but hey 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2021 at 2:41 PM, saX man said:

So folks, lookng at the ignore list:

Carolina Chuck

Forty-eight

over the legal limit

Carolina Chuck2

Carolina Chuck3

Footballlivesmatter

Carolina-chucky

Trainwreck

Pissed-off-Carolina Chuck

Humbled-Carolina-Chuck

--

Which ones are missing?

A couple mods on here come off as pretty douchey, can new ones be elected based of this new ranking system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Whippleman is the first, and only, male to have won the Women's Championship in WWF/WWE history.

Would be cool to hear someone say "Imma Mr. Scot guy"

I guess Andy Kaufman was never official.

2 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Chuck would be Shockmaster

Ouch! 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...