Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold and the RPO


 Share

Recommended Posts

Darnold has show the ability that he can run the ball.  We've all see the highlights of him running the ball, mostly scrambling.  I wonder how he would do in a planned run. 

Do you think Brady might install a couple RPO plays for Darnold?  I know it isn't too wise being the state of our backup QB spot but having that as an option just makes this offense even more potent.   I'm not implying Cam-esk runs but one or two per game would keep defenses honest.

It's a conversation piece, I am not fully endorsing it,  I just would be interested in everyone's opinion. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we'll do it some based on what Brady did for Joe Burrow at LSU.

https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-how-joe-burrow-and-the-lsu-offense-went-from-unknown-to-unstoppable

But, I don't think we'll go crazy with it, as it's less likely to work in the NFL due to the quality and speed of the players. I'd much prefer that they just let Darnold's mobility happen by impressing upon him the need to make good decisions. They need to keep him in the pocket, let him analyze the play, and then make the appropriate read from there, as he has enough options (including his legs) to move the chains. 

https://www.sbnation.com/2018/2/28/17056432/sam-darnold-nfl-draft-usc-quarterback-offense

But, yeah, a couple of RPOs per game might not hurt anything. It's just another wrinkle to vex the opposition, but let Sam master the nuances of being an adept pocket passer.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think we'll do it some based on what Brady did for Joe Burrow at LSU.

https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-how-joe-burrow-and-the-lsu-offense-went-from-unknown-to-unstoppable

But, I don't think we'll go crazy with it, as it's less likely to work in the NFL due to the quality and speed of the players. I'd much prefer that they just let Darnold's mobility happen by impressing upon him the need to make good decisions. They need to keep him in the pocket, let him analyze the play, and then make the appropriate read from there, as he has enough options (including his legs) to move the chains. 

https://www.sbnation.com/2018/2/28/17056432/sam-darnold-nfl-draft-usc-quarterback-offense

But, yeah, a couple of RPOs per game might not hurt anything. It's just another wrinkle to vex the opposition, but let Sam master the nuances of being an adept pocket passer.

RPOs have been effective in the NFL for a while now. 

I suggest understanding what it is to discuss it. Nobody seems to know what it means 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people confuse the read option with the RPO.

Read option is what Shula ran here with Cam.  Some read options have a throwing component, yes, but mostly the read option is what Cam did when deciding to keep the ball or let Stewart have it.

RPO is when the QB reads the defense and decides if the play is a run or pass based on what he sees.

I don't think Darnold is a good candidate for read option.  Yes, he's decently athletic and mobile, but do you really want to expose our only real QB to any potential hit he doesn't have to take?  With this line?

I prefer Darnold focus on becoming more like Aaron Rodgers than Cam Newton.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I think people confuse the read option with the RPO.

Read option is what Shula ran here with Cam.  Some read options have a throwing component, yes, but mostly the read option is what Cam did when deciding to keep the ball or let Stewart have it.

RPO is when the QB reads the defense and decides if the play is a run or pass based on what he sees.

I don't think Darnold is a good candidate for read option.  Yes, he's decently athletic and mobile, but do you really want to expose our only real QB to any potential hit he doesn't have to take?  With this line?

I prefer Darnold focus on becoming more like Aaron Rodgers than Cam Newton.

Hopefully with more rpo success tyan Rogers.

"Aaron Rodgers has the most pass attempts on run-pass options (RPOs) in the league this season. He already has more RPO pass attempts through 11 games (34) than he did through 16 games in 2018 (24). But there’s a slight problem; Green Bay’s RPOs haven’t been particularly effective."

 

This link  reiterates what the RPO is vs what many here mistakenly think it is.

 

"The general idea behind the RPO is with a run and pass option built into the same play, the quarterback can use either a pre- or post-snap read to hand the ball off or throw. With the play based on what the defense is giving,"

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/the-green-bay-packers-need-to-improve-their-rpos/

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Darnold has show the ability that he can run the ball.  We've all see the highlights of him running the ball, mostly scrambling.  I wonder how he would do in a planned run. 

Do you think Brady might install a couple RPO plays for Darnold?  I know it isn't too wise being the state of our backup QB spot but having that as an option just makes this offense even more potent.   I'm not implying Cam-esk runs but one or two per game would keep defenses honest.

It's a conversation piece, I am not fully endorsing it,  I just would be interested in everyone's opinion. 

You mean a Read-Option type play?  I think RPO is the decision at the mesh point to hand it off or pull it back and hit a quick slant/post. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Hopefully with more rpo success tyan Rogers.

"Aaron Rodgers has the most pass attempts on run-pass options (RPOs) in the league this season. He already has more RPO pass attempts through 11 games (34) than he did through 16 games in 2018 (24). But there’s a slight problem; Green Bay’s RPOs haven’t been particularly effective."

 

This link  reiterates what the RPO is vs what many here mistakenly think it is.

 

"The general idea behind the RPO is with a run and pass option built into the same play, the quarterback can use either a pre- or post-snap read to hand the ball off or throw. With the play based on what the defense is giving,"

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/the-green-bay-packers-need-to-improve-their-rpos/

 

Exactly why Darnold shouldn't be running any rpo's.

Even Rodgers hasn't quite master that skill yet. And people sleep on Rodgers mobility like Brees.

Darnold's no threat running, the reason why he may have a couple highlights here and there because no one really respects him as a runner.

Sidenote: Trying to change Darnold game is like trying to make Cam a pocket passer. Darnold's actually very good moving within the pocket.

Edited by CPsinceDay1
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Exactly why Darnold shouldn't be running any rpo's.

Even Rodgers hasn't quite master that skill yet. And people sleep on Rodgers mobility like Brees.

Darnold's no threat running, the reason why he may have a couple highlights here and there because no one really respects him as a runner.

Of course he should. Everyone uses them.

Y'all really should read the articles.

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

 

https://www.sbnation.com/2018/2/28/17056432/sam-darnold-nfl-draft-usc-quarterback-offense

But, yeah, a couple of RPOs per game might not hurt anything. It's just another wrinkle to vex the opposition, but let Sam master the nuances of being an adept pocket passer.

 

33 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Of course he should. Everyone uses them.

Y'all really should read the articles.

Darnold’s DISASTROUS PICK 6 against Ohio State, which more or less sealed the game with 44 minutes to go, came on such an RPO, as he threw a hitch that a late-spinning safety easily housed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The new (released today) FOX ONE app will allow you access to watch your Local FOX Station - similar to how the Paramount Plus app allows you access to watch your local CBS station It'll cost you $20/month for the privilege, but if you're having trouble accessing the over-the-air antenna for FOX, this could be an option to consider the new ESPN app will give you access to ESPN content, but not to the local ABC affiliate. A reminder: if you currently get ESPN via some TV provider (cable, satellite, youtube, etc) then you should be able to use the new ESPN app via your provider login, no additional payment required
    • Not even close!!! BURNS was a one trick pony who had a big game or two a year in the sack collum and was invinsible the rest of the time....   Heck hes gonna be the Giants fourth best rusher this year.
    • XL went to one of the worst teams in the NFL.  One that features a weak passing O and bad overall QB play on the season.   XL is getting way too much hate IMO.   He had an okay rookie season all things considered.   Very much on par w/ prospects that projected around the same area with him.   Panthers made a 2nd rounder a first round technicality for that contract.  XL also getting this weird kicker type blame for games.  XL somehow single handedly lost us games on one play.....and then we ignore the rest of the team that went about losing the game for 4 quarters.   Should he of caught the Philly ball? 100%.  The O and D still played like garbage that entire game.  Even after the drop, Panthers had two shots starting w/ a 3rd and 4 to convert.  They kept playing bad instead.  And even if we XL made the play....Philly would have had a minute and half to get into FG range to win it.  Who is banking on the Panther D getting that stop?  also, I am deemed Mr. Negative, yet here I am defending a no good dirty Gamecock lol  
×
×
  • Create New...