Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Watson trade now as unlikely as ever...


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure we're "monitoring" a lot of situations.

But you forgot something else we know, or to be more correct something  David Tepper knows, specifically that he is not a talent evaluator and isn't ever going to be.

If the current guys in charge aren't up to the task, I expect we'll get new guys in charge. That'd be the sensible move.

If Tepper decides instead to follow the examples of guys like Jerry Jones, Dan Snyder and Jeffrey Lurie, that'll tell me that he's not as smart as I hope he is.

No one has to be a talent evaluator to know that Deshaun Watson is a franchise QB, not even David Tepper. That part has already been established. Once a player has already established his status as a top dawg, then the emphasis comes down to other things, just saying. This isn't a case of talent evaluation.

I don't think it's a stretch for an owner to strongly suggest, if not outright twist the arm of his underlings, that he'd like a certain established veteran (particularly in free agency, which is not the case for Watson of course), particularly at QB, especially if that QB is young, talented and pretty much proven, if it works from a business perspective. That being said, I don't think that makes said owners necessarily go to the extent of Jerry Jones, Dan Snyder or Jeff Lurie, or even fundamentally believe in or desire to manifest that trio's modus operandi (even though two have championships).

 

 

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, top dawg said:

No one has to be a talent evaluator to know that Deshaun Watson is a franchise QB, not even David Tepper. That part has already been established. Once a player has already established his status as a top dawg, then the emphasis comes down to other things, just saying. This isn't a case of talent evaluation.

I don't think it's a stretch for an owner to strongly suggest, if not outright twist the arm of his underlings, that he'd like a certain established veteran (particularly in free agency, which is not the case for Watson of course), particularly at QB, especially if that QB is young, talented and pretty much proven, if it works from a business perspective. That being said, I don't think that makes said owners necessarily go to the extent of Jerry Jones, Dan Snyder or Jeff Lurie, or even fundamentally believe in or desire to manifest that trio's modus operandi (even though two have championships).

It's not as simple as "hey, this guy is good so go get him." You also have to establish what you're willing to give up to go get that guy.

If professional football guys tell a guy with zero personnel experience "this is too much to give up" and he doesn't listen, then he's not gonna have good football people working for him for very long. That's how you wind up with guys like Howie Roseman and Marty Hurney making your football decisions.

And if that's what Tepper wants, he can have it.

It would just mean that he's stupid.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not as simple as "hey, this guy is good so go get him." You also have to establish what you're willing to give up to go get that guy.

If professional football guys tell a guy with zero personnel experience "this is too much to give up" and he doesn't listen, then he's not gonna have good football people working for him for very long. That's how you wind up with guys like Howie Roseman and Marty Hurney making your football decisions.

And if that's what Tepper wants, he can have it.

It would just mean that he's stupid.

That's not what's happening in the case of Desean Watson. We all know it. It's also why I said there are other considerations.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That's not what's happening in the case of Desean Watson. We all know it. It's also why I said there are other considerations.

No. What's happening with Watson is we're not interested because we've settled on Sam Darnold as the guy for now and probably at least next season.

Beyond that, we'll see.

But lemme ask you this: If your doctor suddenly decided that since they're smart enough to be a doctor they should also be able to fly a 747 (no lessons or experience needed because hey, they're a doctor and doctors are smart) would you buy a ticket on their maiden flight?

Tepper making football decisions because, you know, he's good at business and all makes just about as much sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get that there are people who still desperately want to subscribe to this idea that David Tepper is some backstage power broker who's prepared to move heaven and earth to get Watson or some other franchise QB. And I'll grant that it's probably more fun to imagine that than the notion that he's just a regular owner who's prepared to simply trust his football people to do their jobs.

Unfortunately, all the actual evidence says it's wishful thinking.

Mind you, there's plenty of evidence in the opposite direction, not the least of which is Justin Fields' current address.

But hey, if you wanna keep picturing some fantasy blockbuster deal or whatever, you can do that.

You should likely be prepared for disappointment though.

"Jerry Jones sucks!! We want Tepper to do the same!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cookinbrak said:

"Jerry Jones sucks!! We want Tepper to do the same!!"

Nobody wants the owner to interfere...unless it's to get the guy they want.

I can honestly say though that even if I knew David Tepper agreed with every idea I had, I'd still prefer he stay out of personnel decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

No. What's happening with Watson is we're not interested because we've settled on Sam Darnold as the guy for now and probably at least next season.

Beyond that, we'll see.

But lemme ask you this: If your doctor suddenly decided that since they're smart enough to be a doctor they should also be able to fly a 747 (no lessons or experience needed because hey, they're a doctor and doctors are smart) would you buy a ticket on their maiden flight?

Tepper making football decisions because, you know, he's good at business and all makes just about as much sense. 

Again, Scot, that's not really what's going on here.

But, yes Darnold is today's project, but his status is about as settled as his "happy feet" under pressure. He may become settled--the answer to all our problems--but that remains to be seen. And as things aren't settled, we're still interested in Watson (whether you want to admit it or not). Darnold's play, or Watson's legal status, can erase that interest for sure. Even a Rattler, Ridder, or a Howell can erase that interest for sure (business doesn't wait on Watson), if it comes to that, but let's not pretend that there's no interest.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Again, Scot, that's not really what's going on here.

But, yes Darnold is today's project, but his status is about as settled as his "happy feet" under pressure. He may become settled--the answer to all our problems--but that remains to be seen. And as things aren't settled, we're still interested in Watson (whether you want to admit it or not). Darnold's play, or Watson's legal status, can erase that interest for sure. Even a Rattler, Ridder, or a Howell can erase that interest for sure (business doesn't wait on Watson), if it comes to that, but let's not pretend that there's no interest.

Except that, you know, they said there's not. And even Verge affirmed that as a true statement.

You can suggest that maybe they could be down the road, but everything right now says they're not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Except that, you know, they said there's not. And even Verge affirmed that as a true statement.

You can suggest that maybe they could be down the road, but everything right now says they're not.

We are not interested RIGHT NOW. I really doubt we are out of the race should Sam Darnold fail. Just a matter of timelines really. Front office confidence in Darnold is very high, but we all know that can change in a matter of weeks.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Verge said:

We are not interested RIGHT NOW. I really doubt we are out of the race should Sam Darnold fail. Just a matter of timelines really. Front office confidence in Darnold is very high, but we all know that can change in a matter of weeks.

Which is consistent with what I've said.

It's not just a matter of what happens with Darnold though. There's still the matter of Watson's legal issues.

That's why I think if Darnold does fail, our next QB will come from the Draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Which is consistent with what I've said.

It's not just a matter of what happens with Darnold though. There's still the matter of Watson's legal issues.

That's why I think if Darnold does fail, our next QB will come from the Draft.

Just because we don't have immediate interest doesn't mean that we won't have long term interest. That's all some of us are saying.

You won't see me crying if we land Rattler or Ridder (for example). Truth be told, I'd prefer it to Watson, and that's even knowing that they aren't guaranteed stars.

For me personally, Sam better blow my socks off, or I won't be satisfied with NOT drafting a top prospect.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Verge said:

We are not interested RIGHT NOW. I really doubt we are out of the race should Sam Darnold fail. Just a matter of timelines really. Front office confidence in Darnold is very high, but we all know that can change in a matter of weeks.

What odds are you placing that Darnold is the "guy"? Personal odds, not panther or outside noise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...