Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?

RIPTreyLance

By RIPTreyLance,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

RIPTreyLance Enthusiast

RIPTreyLance

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns got a sack, multiple pressures, a TFL and a PD. I hope he gets “tossed like a rag doll” more often. 

Lol I stare at burns every play of the game when we're out there. They moved him around and he hardly got any pressure va Tunsil. His sack he came in untouched just like he has with all his other sacks so far. He was getting tossed around lol. I love burns, I'm not pushing some agenda against him, I have no bias 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

Don't get me wrong I'd love to have Tunsil but there's absolutely no chance they're trading him. Beyond the fact that they just traded two firsts to aquire him two years ago, they just restructured his contract in such a way that trading him would leave them on the hook with pretty obscene dead money. Whether they're entering a rebuild or not, (they're not really only at QB), you dont trade a franchise LT especially one who's under 30 when you're likely hunting for a new rookie franchise quarterback. It's a ridiculous prospect.

 

It's just a fantasy that you've concocted that's not really worth discussing it's merits.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Maybe you want to take a look at some of the Baldy Breakdown where Hassan Redick blows by Tunsil like he isn't there.  Repeatedly.

Reddick is going to be a 12+ sack guy again...those guys being that elite don't' mean he's a poo LT though. He god damn annihilated Tunsil on that one break down though my god. OFC he's done that to everyone as the Saints have a legit LT too.

Says more about Reddick than it does about Tunsil though, the man is special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Lol I stare at burns every play of the game when we're out there. They moved him around and he hardly got any pressure va Tunsil. His sack he came in untouched just like he has with all his other sacks so far. He was getting tossed around lol. I love burns, I'm not pushing some agenda against him, I have no bias 

You would think they wouldn’t have had so much trouble running the ball then right? Just run to Burns side and watch Tunsil throw him around…

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RIPTreyLance Enthusiast

RIPTreyLance

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Don't get me wrong I'd love to have Tunsil but there's absolutely no chance they're trading him. Beyond the fact that they just traded two firsts to aquire him two years ago, they just restructured his contract in such a way that trading him would leave them on the hook with pretty obscene dead money. Whether they're entering a rebuild or not, (they're not really only at QB), you dont trade a franchise LT especially one who's under 30 when you're likely hunting for a new rookie franchise quarterback. It's a ridiculous prospect.

 

It's just a fantasy that you've concocted that's not really worth discussing it's merits.

Respectable answer 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RIPTreyLance Enthusiast

RIPTreyLance

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Anyone who does not realize that Guard is our weakest position on the line, is not a full time fan. 

Our O line is horrible as a whole, why is it with you know it all's people either agree with you or that suddenly makes someone not a full time fan? 

Two things can be true. Our guards are terrible and our left tackle is terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...