Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns got a sack, multiple pressures, a TFL and a PD. I hope he gets “tossed like a rag doll” more often. 

Lol I stare at burns every play of the game when we're out there. They moved him around and he hardly got any pressure va Tunsil. His sack he came in untouched just like he has with all his other sacks so far. He was getting tossed around lol. I love burns, I'm not pushing some agenda against him, I have no bias 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

Don't get me wrong I'd love to have Tunsil but there's absolutely no chance they're trading him. Beyond the fact that they just traded two firsts to aquire him two years ago, they just restructured his contract in such a way that trading him would leave them on the hook with pretty obscene dead money. Whether they're entering a rebuild or not, (they're not really only at QB), you dont trade a franchise LT especially one who's under 30 when you're likely hunting for a new rookie franchise quarterback. It's a ridiculous prospect.

 

It's just a fantasy that you've concocted that's not really worth discussing it's merits.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Maybe you want to take a look at some of the Baldy Breakdown where Hassan Redick blows by Tunsil like he isn't there.  Repeatedly.

Reddick is going to be a 12+ sack guy again...those guys being that elite don't' mean he's a poo LT though. He god damn annihilated Tunsil on that one break down though my god. OFC he's done that to everyone as the Saints have a legit LT too.

Says more about Reddick than it does about Tunsil though, the man is special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Lol I stare at burns every play of the game when we're out there. They moved him around and he hardly got any pressure va Tunsil. His sack he came in untouched just like he has with all his other sacks so far. He was getting tossed around lol. I love burns, I'm not pushing some agenda against him, I have no bias 

You would think they wouldn’t have had so much trouble running the ball then right? Just run to Burns side and watch Tunsil throw him around…

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Don't get me wrong I'd love to have Tunsil but there's absolutely no chance they're trading him. Beyond the fact that they just traded two firsts to aquire him two years ago, they just restructured his contract in such a way that trading him would leave them on the hook with pretty obscene dead money. Whether they're entering a rebuild or not, (they're not really only at QB), you dont trade a franchise LT especially one who's under 30 when you're likely hunting for a new rookie franchise quarterback. It's a ridiculous prospect.

 

It's just a fantasy that you've concocted that's not really worth discussing it's merits.

Respectable answer 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Anyone who does not realize that Guard is our weakest position on the line, is not a full time fan. 

Our O line is horrible as a whole, why is it with you know it all's people either agree with you or that suddenly makes someone not a full time fan? 

Two things can be true. Our guards are terrible and our left tackle is terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
    • Same thing I first thought but then I saw it was against Jacksonville and took about half a second of playing to know. I was at that game.  I can't tell you my level of excitement when I saw it was Delhomme instead of Peete who came out for the 2nd half. Delhomme has and will probably always be my favorite Panther.
×
×
  • Create New...