Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Cowboys - What do you know?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Look it's a wanna be gangster Dallas Cowpoke fan.

Nah, im not a gangster...  but when I'm invited, I show up and handle business.  So what do you consider the coward that offered me up???  Is he a wanna be gangster too???  Or are you just addressing me instead of the dude that offered me up because you're a fan boy of his and you want to impress him???  Which one is it??

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Why don't you stick to Politics and go back to posting at CNN or FoxNews or whatever hole you crawled out of?

All you're doing here is trolling and you're not welcome.

I came hear talking football and the BS came to me.  So I tossed it back to those weaklings that started it with me.  Take a look at my first posts.  All football, then look at the losers who started talking trash to me and insulting me.  I've had some good conversations with other knowledgeable fans on this board and it was great takes exchanged.  So why don't you address those one or two losers on this board.  If not that means you are just like them.  Thank God for the educated posters on this board. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

 

Triggered by asking a question???  Cmon lil guy I was just making a point that the league does not favor one team over the 31 other teams.  If that was the case, they would have "reffed" them into more Superbowls over the course of the last 25 years.  I was just addressing the fans here who are "Triggered" by their own excuses in case of a loss.

I mean, yeah, not 1 team over 31 others but I’ve watched enough football to know that any certain ref crew is only doing 1 game, and have definitively watched enough to know them fools can be biased for the game they’re working… poo ain’t been the same since the ‘you’re too young to get that call’ calling out of the officiating…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, j2sgam said:

I mean, yeah, not 1 team over 31 others but I’ve watched enough football to know that any certain ref crew is only doing 1 game, and have definitively watched enough to know them fools can be biased for the game they’re working… poo ain’t been the same since the ‘you’re too young to get that call’ calling out of the officiating…

I agree with you.  Some ref crews pretty much suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KB_fan said:

Not really sure this is the best thread for this...., but since it's related to the upcoming game on Sunday, here are this week's Panthers Practice Squad protections:

 

 

Makes sense as we are thin at RB and S due to injury, bare bones at LB and still unsettled at K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...