Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday Panthers - Cowboys injury report


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

What is wrong with you guys? John Miller has been our best interior OL... Because he may not be vaccinated you're hoping that he's out due to injury? Or are you that obsessed with having a 6th round rookie play? Brown looks like he could be promising but he's extremely unlikely to be Andrew Norwell part 2. More likely that he sucks worse than any of our starting OL and the other backups ahead of him on the depth chart.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

I'd like to say equal weight should be given to how Sam performs without CMC. With CMC out, Dallas is sure to blitz a lot. 

I dont think its equal or close. I feel that Dak&Zeke are best QBRB combo in the league. Dallas O carries the team, OL and WRs are top shelf as well. D is mid-late pack missing DL and DB talents. If the snow show continues, Panthers O is good enough for their normal 27-ish points and that should be enough. 

I feel Sam will perform better than Teddy w/o CMC, but this team has a better O group than last year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, t96 said:

What is wrong with you guys? John Miller has been our best interior OL... Because he may not be vaccinated you're hoping that he's out due to injury? Or are you that obsessed with having a 6th round rookie play? Brown looks like he could be promising but he's extremely unlikely to be Andrew Norwell part 2. More likely that he sucks worse than any of our starting OL and the other backups ahead of him on the depth chart.

 

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't get the hate for John Miller either.


I know.  There is a lot of  sheer hatred towards our OL men.

I don't get it either.

Haters gonna hate I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...