Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Breakdown of the O-Line play from Sunday


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Anyone who thinks Paradis was the worst pass protection guy needs to learn how to watch film. He wasn't good but there were two other guys who played a lot worse and gave up more pressures.

That first sack looked so bad, where Paradis got thrown back so far, that I think everyone is projecting that out to the entire game.

According to this 

NFL Week 4 Game Recap: Dallas Cowboys 36, Carolina Panthers 28 | NFL News, Rankings and Statistics | PFF

Paradis had 1 sack allowed and 2 pressures allowed.

Ervin had 1 sack allowed and 6 pressures allowed.

Miller had 1 sack allowed and 5 pressures allowed.

Also I'm pretty sure Miller had a penalty and maybe Ervin also.

And for those that don't trust PFF, those numbers are actually close to what I saw when I went back and charted the game.

All three were bad, but if you actually go back and watch those three players on every snap, not the ball, Paradis was the least bad of those three and to be honest his PFF grade is inline with that.  His actual PFF grade was low for pass protection, his overall grade looked better than people expected because he played above average in the run game.

 

 

 

 

I don't need a recap I saw with my own two eyes were the pressures and sacks were coming from straight up the A gap. The guards weren't great but Paradis was the main culprit on more than one sack even if his man wasn't credited with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Appealing to PFF as authoritative?

Ummm... 😕

Do you have a better source for pressures allowed per player for the game?

Actually I went back and charted Paradis myself and it was inline with what PFF had.  Paradis didn't play well in the pass game, but Erving and Miller played worse.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot more to interior OLine play that just staying between your man and the QB.  This is why Paradis is being graded highly.  His technique is fine, he keeps himself in relatively good position.  The problem our entire interior has is that they get pushed backwards. 

Interior push is arguably the most important part of pressuring the QB.  Defensively, when you prevent a QB from climbing the pocket, or even stepping into his throw, you've done good work.  Sure, you'd like sacks and hits, but just obscuring his vision and lanes and making him move are all things that create challenges to the timing and execution of the passing game.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Do you have a better source for pressures allowed per player for the game?

Actually I went back and charted Paradis myself and it was inline with what PFF had.  Paradis didn't play well in the pass game, but Erving and Miller played worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I don't need a recap I saw with my own two eyes were the pressures and sacks were coming from straight up the A gap. The guards weren't great but Paradis was the main culprit on more than one sack even if his man wasn't credited with it. 

Pressure right after the half you referenced when Paradis wasn't blocking anyone like you said, Double 
A gap, he had the guy on the right, that guy delayed and then looped around.  Its not run blocking he isn't going towards the guy to block him he is watching his zone.  RB had the left defender.  Once the guy did blitz Paradis blocked him from the side.  Even if you call that a pressure its one of the 2 or 3?  

4th sack, he blocked his guy.  Defender lines up over Paradis, and attacks outside shoulder of Paradis.  Daley didn't come off to help as much as Daley's guy looped around.  Watch the play in slow motion, Daley actually ends up behind the defender and Paradis still has good inside leverage on the defender and rides him to the side of Sam.   Miller's guy actually got the sack.

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Lol

First of all PFF's grades aren't based on statistics, but I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

I asked if you had a better source for pressures per player for the game.  I'm open to suggestions.

How about you?

Why don't you go back and actually watch each player on the line one at a time and chart how many pressures each allow, but then you might actually have an educated opinion, but its a lot easier just to be a sheep and follow what everyone else is perceiving.

Are you saying that Erving and Miller had less pressures than Paradis?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Lol

First of all PFF's grades aren't based on statistics, but I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

I asked if you had a better source for pressures per player for the game.  I'm open to suggestions.

How about you?

Why don't you go back and actually watch each player on the line one at a time and chart how many pressures each allow, but then you might actually have an educated opinion, but its a lot easier just to be a sheep and follow what everyone else is perceiving.

Are you saying that Erving and Miller had less pressures than Paradis?

See the answer from Brian S above regarding a big reason why PFF grades miss the mark.

And no, I'm not going to bother to chart stuff because I don't give a sh-t about stats. I see what I see, and I understand what I see because I've been watching and studying the game since I was five years old. My "grading system" has only two categories: "good enough" and "not good enough".

Plus if you actually read what I've already posted, you'd have a better understanding of what I saw in this game.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaqattaq said:

chalk it up to "poo happens". Slater is playing great , and was who I had in my mock draft, FWIW :), but Horn was a beast until he got hurt. I'm not hating the pick.

Way too many people evaluate draft picks based solely on what they're doing this year.

You also have to factor in what the Horn pick allows us to do in future seasons.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

See the answer from Brian S above regarding a big reason why PFF grades miss the mark.

And no, I'm not going to bother to chart stuff because I don't give a sh-t about stats. I see what I see, and I understand what I see because I've been watching and studying the game since I was five years old. My "grading system" has only two categories: "good enough" and "not good enough".

Plus if you actually read what I've already posted, you'd have a better understanding of what I saw in this game.

But what you see is a stat you just aren't writing it down, so in reality you do care, you just don't do a good job of tracking it.  You go off memory and the limited plays you notice. 

So in your limited eye test who did you see give up the most pressures?  

I didn't say Paradis was good enough, I said he played better than Miller or Erving, which is inline with what PFF said.  So if you don't agree with PFF's grades are you saying those two played better?

In regards to what Brian S said above he makes a valid point, but in reality Paradis didn't get graded high in pass protection.  Everyone is upset about his grade but they don't even realize his actual pass protection grade was bad.

If you do want to go by Brian S criteria to judge the lineman, which like i said is valid, you can still make the argument that Paradis played better than Erving and Miller in this game which is all I am saying.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

But what you see is a stat you just aren't writing it down, so in reality you do care, you just don't do a good job of tracking it.  You go off memory and the limited plays you notice. 

So in your limited eye test who did you see give up the most pressures?  

I didn't say Paradis was good enough, I said he played better than Miller or Erving, which is inline with what PFF said.  So if you don't agree with PFF's grades are you saying those two played better?

In regards to what Brian S said above he makes a valid point, but in reality Paradis didn't get graded high in pass protection.  Everyone is upset about his grade but they don't even realize his actual pass protection grade was bad.

If you do want to go by Brian S criteria to judge the lineman, which like i said is valid, you can still make the argument that Paradis played better than Erving and Miller in this game which is all I am saying.

That first paragraph is...convoluted 😳

And again, you're not getting it. I don't care who gave up 5 pressures versus 7. I care about who I saw doing a good job and who I didn't.

Frankly, I'd put more stock in Spanish's analysis from the OP than I would the PFF grades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That first paragraph is...convoluted 😳

And again, you're not getting it. I don't care who gave up 5 pressures versus 7. I care about who I saw doing a good job and who I didn't.

Frankly, I'd put more stock in Spanish's analysis from the OP than I would the PFF grades.

So you think Paradis did worse that Erving and Miller for the game?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

So you think Paradis did worse that Erving and Miller for the game?

You're still missing the point.

I don't care.

Paradis was bad.

Miller was bad.

Erving has been good previously, but in this game he was bad.

Who was worst? Who gives a sh-t? 🙄

Just like the people Harry Tasker killed, they were all bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, we built on that momentum alright. LOL Trying to prop up a QB with a game plan instead of trying to do your best to win a game with the tools you have at your disposal is what you do with a rookie early on in his career on a bad team. It's not what you do with a 3rd year #1 overall pick when you're shockingly sitting at 6-5 and playing for the division lead.
    • Canales outsmarts himself on a very consisent basis. In some ways, he is one of the most ill suited to be head coach of the Tepper tenure.
    • i find this to be alarming on so many levels  im going to change the order of the portions i copied from Joe’s article i  really have serious doubts   about Canales’ common sense  1. A running team forgetting to run  2. Making this game plan about Young’s passing game momentum .  Total idiot.  It is about winning games not about young’s momentum. That is what practice is for , not live games  god help us all.    Article below  Confused by the Panthers’ pass-heavy play calls vs. 49ers? Rico Dowdle probably was, too   CHARLOTTE, N.C. — In two seasons here, Canales has juggled offensive play calling with his head coach responsibilities. Sometimes the balls end up on the floor. In two critical moments Monday night, Canales chose to go with a pass in situations where a handoff would have been the more direct approach. The first was the disastrous, first-and-goal play from the 1 where Bryce Young opted against running in for the score and instead lobbed the ball toward rookie Mitchell Evans, only to see safety Ji’Ayir Brown come down with it. The second one was just as perplexing. When the 49ers were whistled for roughing long snapper J.J. Jansen on Ryan Fitzgerald’s successful PAT pulled the Panthers to 17-10, Canales took the point off the board and went for a 2-pointer from the 1. But Canales ran a play that didn’t take advantage of the spot, with Young missing Jalen Coker in the back of the end zone. (Rookie wideout Jimmy Horn Jr. appeared to be the first read in the flat.) Canales said after the game he wanted to build on Young’s record-breaking passing performance in Atlanta, and thought the line was protecting well. But that lack of rhythm Canales mentioned was the result of never giving Dowdle the opportunity to get into it. When Dowdle ripped off a 17-yard gain on the first offensive play of the second half, Canales came back to him two plays later. It was his final carry.   After an overnight, cross-country flight, Rico Dowdle began his Tuesday — at least on social media — with an emoji. Dowdle’s post on Xcontained no words accompanying the face with spiral eyes emoji, which EmojiTerra tells us symbolizes “confusion, dizziness, overwhelm or being utterly shocked.” Per the website, it’s often used to convey “feeling dazed, hypnotized, or caught off-guard in troubling or surprising situations.” It’s not hard to figure out why the Carolina Panthers running back would be feeling some or all of those emotions. Dowdle has been one of the Panthers’ fun, feel-good stories this season, an Asheville native who signed a prove-it deal with his home-state team and then got right to the business of proving it. Before the Panthers hosted the Dallas Cowboys in Week 6, Dowdle warned his former team to “buckle up,” then backed up his words by running for 183 yards and racking up 239 yards from scrimmage. But in a 20-9 loss to the San Francisco 49ers on Monday night, it was Dowdle who was buckled up. And the guy who strapped Dowdle into a safety harness and threw on the child-safety locks was none other than Panthers coach Dave Canales. Dowdle led all backs Monday — including Christian McCaffrey — by averaging 6.3 yards per carry. But while 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan was feeding McCaffrey a cornucopia of 24 carries and 31 touches, Dowdle finished with a meager six rushing attempts. That matched his season low from a loss at Arizona in Week 2, when Chuba Hubbard was still RB1 and the Panthers were throwing nearly every down in the second half trying to catch up. Dowdle wasn’t the only back Canales dissed. Hubbard had just three carries and the Panthers finished with 13 as a team, tied for the fifth fewest in franchise history. Some of it was about opportunity, or lack of it. With the 49ers’ two touchdown drives consuming more than 16 minutes, the Panthers ran just 43 offensive plays, which matched their low under Canales and tied for the second fewest in team history. But Canales, who arrived in Charlotte last year preaching the balanced offense gospel, conceded Tuesday that he didn’t emphasize the running plays on his call sheet nearly enough. “Offensively, just could not get our rhythm going. And really it just started off with the run game. I have to make sure that that comes alive,” he said during an opening statement to reporters. “That’s a part of who we are. It’s a part of what we believe in. We have two great backs that contribute to this team. The offensive line was blocking well and that was a missed opportunity by me. And I’ll do better in that regard.”        
×
×
  • Create New...