Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nothing positive about this game.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I agree with you.  There is enough blame to go around on the offense.  That's who lost this game. 

The defense did everything they could to keep us in the game but the offense just killed any momentum the defense handed them. But I will acknowledge the fact that the game turned on the blown play by Franklin.  The team never seemed to recover after that.

Yeah but that mistake shouldn't have broken our backs like that. The offense mustered a measly 3 points and less than 150 yards after the half. We have to do better than that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The truth is likely somewhere in between. We aren't an undefeated NFL team nor are we as bad as 0-2 versus the NFC East.

Nah. Without CMC, I’d say we are 1-4 at best 0-5 potentially. Jets were mounting a comeback they just ran out of time. The Texans had a third string QB. Saints are slightly an anomaly, but without CMC who knows what would have happened that game.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Nah. Without CMC, I’d say we are 1-4 at best 0-5 potentially. Jets were mounting a comeback they just ran out of time. The Texans had a third string QB. Saints are slightly an anomaly, but without CMC who knows what would have happened that game.

IDK that I agree with that, nor do I agree that CMC might cure all our ails.

We have 12 more games to figure all that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

IDK that I agree with that, nor do I agree that CMC might cure all our ails.

We have 12 more games to figure all that out.

CMC doesn’t cure all the ails. He gives us the safety blanket of a fighting chance. Something that can clearly be seen as missing currently. 

 

And I’m speaking directly about coaching. It’s been the same thing every game of the season so far.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing Positive about today's game....

 

....is that it's over.  

Jesus Christ....WTF was that, man??? simon cowell facepalm GIF

At least our "D" balled out but we need an "O" to score more points than the opposing team and not fug things up!!   We got the opposite of the latter two.

A good part of it is once again....SAM.   But Brady did him no favors either.

The O-Line was improved somewhat merely for the Fact that Cam wasn't in while Brady was but that's the only positive from the Offense. 

I'm just....resigned at this point that perhaps....PERHAPS...the annoying Naysayers about Sam are indeed correct in their knee-jerk assumptions.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CanePantherHornet said:

Have you ever considered that defenses get tired when they're left on the field constantly?

Didn't Carolina have the ball for like 35 minutes compared to 25 for the Eagles?

When that drive started it would have been 23 minutes. They got gassed in 23 minutes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...