Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big picture...


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/development/article255099712.html#storylink=mainstage_card5

here is you some big picture...Charlotte City Council already causing problems on new stadium

they are going to muff this up & our team is going to be playing in SC

Said it more than a year ago. City Council will only be happy if the city is a series of hundreds of small parks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a positive note we might have a decent kicker, the secondary is ridiculously loaded with young talent, hell the defense is loaded with young talent, the offense does have weapons, Sam has shown glimpses of being a play maker and we are definitely improved by a huge margin since Fitty took over.  We just need OL…that is about it

With a decent OL and CMC we are 5-1 or better, no doubt in my mind.

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Lol

I’ve seen Bill Walsh 

ive seen Matt Rhule 

Matt Rhule  is no Bill Walsh  not even on the college level.  Not close.  

 

For every NFL coach that lost 2/3 of games in his first two seasons there are 1000 bad coaches and a handful, at best, Bill Walshes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

 Point of the tweet was fans are impatient. Case and point…posts above 

Understand that but the implication that Matt Rhule is in this category is very far fetched 

no offense intended to you at all .  We all hate losing. We all want a winning team  we all want to think that Rhine is something he probably isn’t  I mean temple and Baylor are not Stanford and I dont remember them beating major programs while there 

but I’m beginning to believe that the Baylor boys, Anderson and Rhule, fleeced ole Tepper out of $30million and $65 million respectively 

my biggest issue with him, you have got to haVe e a QB…it’s ok to have a mercenary while  the drafted QB learns but in today’s nfl, you have got to have a QB   He had multiple chances and in year one Bridgewater and year two Darnold   Come on

i want Darnold to do well  it benefits everyone but that boy can’t get out of his own way 

Fans know it and if Tepper wants that new stadium he best start winning 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...