Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Losing to the Giants - should someone get fired?

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

chbright Mentor

chbright

Posted
Posted

If we get lit on D, someone's head on that side should roll. Jones and his nobody skill position players would need the game of their lives to not make heads roll. Outside of a healthy Jones, this is last year's Detroit lions team we saw with a banged up Stafford. They have a line that might just be worse than ours before the loss of the only OL worth a damn at LT. This is a meeting where the Panthers DL feast like earlier this year, but is more about the aweful OL in NY than anything. Just like the Jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hate to re-post the same thing but :

On 10/21/2021 at 8:34 AM, glenwo2 said:

If Sam can't beat this Giants team, then he can't beat anyone...(without CMC, that is)

 

And it proved to be true. 

Goddammit...the Jets truly broke Sam. 

In the future, I hope when Zach inevitably gets broken, that we don't "inquire" about him.

Let's go draft a QB instead.

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Hate to re-post the same thing but :

And it proved to be true. 

Goddammit...the Jets truly broke Sam. 

In the future, I hope when Zach inevitably gets broken, that we don't "inquire" about him.

Let's go draft a QB instead.

 

Well Wilson did just get broke literally he left the game with a PCL injury.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Hate to re-post the same thing but :

And it proved to be true. 

Goddammit...the Jets truly broke Sam. 

In the future, I hope when Zach inevitably gets broken, that we don't "inquire" about him.

Let's go draft a QB instead.

 

The truth is Darnold was never good. He has to be one of the most overhyped QB prospects I’ve ever seen. He’s accomplished literally nothing in the NFL and wasn’t even that good in college.

And to top it off, Joe Brady is another massive hype train that has no merit to it. Brady has just been around success, never actually achieved it himself. He needs to go back to being an assistant on a well established staff like maybe Alabama or going back to the Saints and learn his trade. What a horrible decision hiring someone so inexperienced.  

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The truth is Darnold was never good. He has to be one of the most overhyped QB prospects I’ve ever seen. He’s accomplished literally nothing in the NFL and wasn’t even that good in college.

And to top it off, Joe Brady is another massive hype train that has no merit to it. Brady has just been around success, never actually achieved it himself. He needs to go back to being an assistant on a well established staff like maybe Alabama or going back to the Saints and learn his trade. What a horrible decision hiring someone so inexperienced.  

Right on both accounts, hep.

I said coming in this season that Sam had zero excuses....and he still sh*t the bed. 

It's over. 

 

And Joe Brady can f*ck off.

Maybe Rhule can pull a Bobby Petrino or something....then Joe can go with him back to the College Ranks.

I imagine Tepper won't stand for this sh*t any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Right on both accounts, hep.

I said coming in this season that Sam had zero excuses....and he still sh*t the bed. 

It's over. 

 

And Joe Brady can f*ck off.

Maybe Rhule can pull a Bobby Petrino or something....then Joe can go with him back to the College Ranks.

I imagine Tepper won't stand for this sh*t any longer.

I can only imagine what Tepper is thinking right now. Dude has egg all over his face real hard. But what can he do at this juncture of the season aside from trade for an accused sexual predator who might not even be eligible to play?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...