Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapaport: Panthers/ Tepper out of Watson deal


FugginPoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, if there is a can't miss OL prospect, just fuging take the guy.

but think of the draft value we'll get with our haul of 2nd and/or 3rd round picks instead of our 1st!11!1!1

😞

This draft will be interesting to see how Fitt/Rhule address the gaping holes in our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Good guards and centers are easier to find than LT's. You can get a good guard or center in the 2nd or 3rd round, not so much LT's.

We just suck at all three of those things.

Another problem is we dont have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. 

This is my dilemma. We dont want to resign paradis, miller and daley are trash.  

Brady was decent last game at LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

The exempt list does nothing right now, he’d still get paid and a suspension doesn’t come into effect until criminal charges are filed or civil is resolved unfavorably for him. That’s why. If there was enough backlash, they’d exempt him. 

the NFL also doesn't need to take action while HOU isn't playing him.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was put on the list as soon as he practiced with his new team... The situation changes immediately when a new team might play him

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

but think of the draft value we'll get with our haul of 2nd and/or 3rd round picks instead of our 1st!11!1!1

😞

This draft will be interesting to see how Fitt/Rhule address the gaping holes in our offense.

Boy, it sure would have been nice to take the 13th highest rated OT in the NFL currently, Rashawn Slater in the first round....

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Boy, it sure would have been nice to take the 13th highest rated OT in the NFL currently, Rashawn Slater in the first round....

 

No kidding.

On the bright side I think that it's an understatement to say we finally addressed cornerback.  I hope we put the same enthusiasm into our OL next offseason...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joemac said:

It means the player has the final say on where they want to be traded to.  They have a clause in their contracts that lets them say "No" to any trades. 

So when you waive it you are saying “no”? Sorry just a little confused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

but think of the draft value we'll get with our haul of 2nd and/or 3rd round picks instead of our 1st!11!1!1

😞

This draft will be interesting to see how Fitt/Rhule address the gaping holes in our offense.

I fully expect us to trade down with our 1st, but probably not out of the 1st entirely.  A whole lot of oline can be had with late 1st and multiple 2nd/3rds.  We can keep our 1st and get an elite LT.  Or we can trade back and can have elite to great center and guards x2.  I know I'd rather solidify 3 positions over just one, especially since the center of our oline is the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

Another problem is we dont have a 2nd or 3rd round pick. 

This is my dilemma. We dont want to resign paradis, miller and daley are trash.  

Brady was decent last game at LT. 

If you get a chance to get an elite LT and you pass, you may as well just shut the doors to the franchise. You don't pass that up for IOL.

Make no mistake, we aren't gonna fix the OL in only one offseason. So we have to get something. Ideally 1-2 competent starters. That is a start. It is a lot easier for 2-3 good offensive linemen to cover up for 2-3 shitty ones. 

Plus we do have free agency. I assume we will have to hire a consultant of some sort to evaluate them, since our coaching staff and front office have never seen what a competent offensive lineman looks like. If they could just take their top 10 favorite guys in free agency and just immediately mark them off the list. That would help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Luciu5 said:

I fully expect us to trade down with our 1st, but probably not out of the 1st entirely.  A whole lot of oline can be had with late 1st and multiple 2nd/3rds.  We can keep our 1st and get an elite LT.  Or we can trade back and can have elite to great center and guards x2.  I know I'd rather solidify 3 positions over just one, especially since the center of our oline is the problem.

trading down only works if someone really wants to come up.  And with this qb class I aint seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

We can get a G or C much much easier later in the draft than a stud LT

The G we got much later in the draft has not played a snap in the regular season. I dont know how we realistically take a LT with out 1st and rebuild the interior of our OL with the few late round picks we have remaining. 

Maybe Brady can move to LG Brown can play RG and we can find a C with one of our late round picks.

Im just trying to envision how to build the OL with a 1st round LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

The G we got much later in the draft has not played a snap in the regular season. I dont know how we realistically take a LT with out 1st and rebuild the interior of our OL with the few late round picks we have remaining. 

Maybe Brady can move to LG Brown can play RG and we can find a C with one of our late round picks.

Im just trying to envision how to build the OL with a 1st round LT. 

There is a reason Brown went in the 6th.  And there are plenty of good prospects in the 4rth 5th range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...