Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The fan base is melting into the ether


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Charlotte fans are definitely performance-based. No support for losing teams. It can’t be that different for other markets as well. The Hornets games will pick up if they keep winning 

Charlotte is a huge transplant city too and all the sports teams are generally quite young. I mean the panthers are what? Halfway through their third generation? So it’ll still be another 5-10 years before the children of life long Panthers fans grow up old enough to continue establishing a base. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

The arena was packed with Celtics fans no different than the stadium has a ton of Cowboys fans even when the Panthers were a winning team. There are some franchises with cache that get by with that. 

As for our stadium experience, anyone who doesn't remember 2001 need only to go to a game anytime this season.

I went to the Spurs/Lakers game the other night in San Antonio, and the arena was legit 75% Lakers fans.  It was sad, but its not exclusive to Charlotte area sports teams. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, joemac said:

I went to the Spurs/Lakers game the other night in San Antonio, and the arena was legit 75% Lakers fans.  It was sad, but its not exclusive to Charlotte area sports teams. 

Any small market team vs. a large market team will face these issues unless they are top of the league. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheoJay10 said:

This is nothing new. This fan base has been horrible. Can’t take many serious. I’m a fan of the team and what it encompasses but these dookie bros and jimbo trailer park boys that are loudest on here are just wastes of semen. 

What does the Navy have to do with the Carolina Panthers? ….. I kid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

that Vikings poo was over the top and a clear indicator that something isn't right and has drastically changed.

My sister and her husband have been PSL owners since the beginning, and she swears this is getting worse. Never really heard her complain about it before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Transient town.......lots of people with loyalty to their born and bred town home teams....They'll want tickets only when their team is in town. 

2) Demographic change.............more Hispanic born per capita than any other city in the US is right here. For them.......football using the feet to move the ball is what the prefer. 

3) Young people don't care.................sports are like cars, houses and families to them...........they are losing interest within generations growing up now..........its cell phones, social media and gaming that rules.

4) Aging PSL owners...........win or lose there is no waiting list to buy them.  

I've worked in marketing in professional sports and have been watching all this since the late 50s ...........so add it all up kids...................and connect the dots..........the apathy for a professional level home sports team is already baked into this town and getting worse. 

Winning solves everything?...........well is used to........ but I'm afraid some don't even care about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:


It started with disregarding the most important player in the history of Charlotte sports, then replacing him with Teddy Bridgewater, and THEN replacing HIM with Sam Darnold. It’s honestly been a shitshow.

Cheer up….Nick Foles or Blaine Gabbert are next…..

(I kid, I kid) 

you are right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...