Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule being as honest as it will get


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

You can trade into the top 10-15 you are aware, right? Did the 49ers and Pats not do that this past draft to get "their guy?" Did the Chiefs not do that to get Mahomes?

What you are talking about is precisely what the cellar dwellers of the NFL have done for years. Being bad and overdrafting prospects that were reaches. That's what awful teams do. That's Panic Drafting 101.

what you are doing is what teams who spend their whole history going 8-8 do.  Also the type of prospect you are waiting for in the draft doesn't go 10-15, they go top 10.

Would we have been better off rolling with Grier 2 years ago and not going down the Teddy and Sam path?

Yes.  We probably would have picked 3rd this past draft and we would have took a QB and we would have been trying to develop him.  I'm not saying he would have been a sure thing but we would have our plan at this point.

Whether we draft a QB this year or next, an extra 2-3 wins this upcoming season is pointless that you might get from some temporary QB.  Take your lumps, find your guy and use your resources wisely.

 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

what you are doing is what teams who spend their whole history going 8-8 do.  Also the type of prospect you are waiting for in the draft doesn't go 10-15, they go top 10.

Would we have been better off rolling with Grier 2 years ago and not going down the Teddy and Sam path?

Yes.  We probably would have picked 3rd this past draft and we would have took a QB and we would have been trying to develop him.  I'm not saying he would have been a sure thing but we would have our plan at this point.

Whether we draft a QB this year or next, an extra 2-3 wins this upcoming season is pointless that you might get from some temporary QB.  Take your lumps, find your guy and use your resources wisely.

Agree to disagree based on recent NFL history. 

The path of an NFL dumpster fire isn't one that ends in success very often, it mostly just ends in ashes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Agree to disagree based on recent NFL history. 

The path of an NFL dumpster fire isn't one that ends in success very often, it mostly just ends in ashes.

If you spend 4m on some washed up vet is the fire really that much different?

In reality both of us saw this coming, and I think we are both agree that the best of course of action is to draft a guy at some point.

You would prefer a couple of more wins in the meantime, I would prefer more cap to use in the future.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

If you spend 4m on some washed up vet is the fire really that much different?

In reality both of us saw this coming, and I think we are both agree that the best of course of action is to draft a guy at some point.

You would prefer a couple of more wins in the meantime, I would prefer more cap to use in the future.

We fundamentally disagree on the way to get there but we want to be in the same spot. 

Not that it matters, we are gonna sign Josh Rosen or Dwayne Haskins to a 4 year, $65 mil contract given the way we evaluate QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, CRA said:

the most likely answer, is a NFL LB just called it like he saw it though.  

and I don't know if it is overblown or not.  That's not one of my primary Sam issues.  I know Sam has lots of issues with his game....and when you add them all up togther, the collective sum is clearly problematic and has been. 

I just think more often than not it's the two things being true aspect applying.  Sam Darnold simply can't see the field.  Collectively, the NFL world has made this point loud and clear.  I assume his present teammates know this problem.  I assume his coaches do.   It causes him to do really stupid things with the ball and he often will put people in bad spots because of that.  Does that impact his WRs? If they are human? I assume it would to some degree.  How much?  Who knows.  Most NFL players at some point are going to have to deal with that. 

All of that can be true. 

and at the same time, Robby can be playing like trash this season....and DJ Moore has never had Nuk Hopkins like dependable hands.   

and the OL can be weak and cause a host of problem for others.  From QB to playcaller.  

and Sam can still make horrible decisions and not be a good QB right now...that are not be caused by the OL or Brady. 

Joe Brady can be young and lacking. 

Joe Brady can also be screwed from actully have the basic resources a young and inexperiecned OC probably needs.  He probably at least needs vet QB, or a good QB, or at least a decent OL.  Something. 

Lot of things can be true.   

 

Everything you just said is exactly what we are witnessing.  One would have to be blind not to see it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

it's not one comment though.  89 wasn't the commentator the other week when it was pointed out Sam opened up a game throwing a hosptial ball to DJ.   He just didn't use the phrase hosptial ball.  

Think it was Vilma that time. 

 

Pardon me.  You're correct.
It was Vilma.

My point still stands :

Shut the fk up about Hospital Balls. 

You're a WR...GO CATCH THE FK'N BALL.   That's it.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We fundamentally disagree on the way to get there but we want to be in the same spot. 

Not that it matters, we are gonna sign Josh Rosen or Dwayne Haskins to a 4 year, $65 mil contract given the way we evaluate QB's.

😨🤢🤮

I was thinking Daniel Jones, but he isn't at the bottom of the dumpster so I suppose those two make sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

I agree completely... The offense is just playing poorly... and tbh, some of these problems predate our losing streak... Its as if the people blaming "hospital balls" for the WR play just ignored everything being said about our WR group's hands in preseason.  this has been a persistent problem, and I think it points at something far outside whether the WRs like Darnold or not.  nor is this excusing Darnold being bad, lol, but we can also acknowledge that a group that was supposed to be one of our strengths is not turning out that way.

last year DJ had the same number of drops he'd had in his first two years combined. there's something off with coaching / preparation imo (this is not me blaming Brady, as I have no clue what is going on there).

It's almost like they want to give lame excuses for the WR struggles and push ALL the blame onto Sam.

They may deny they're doing it but they actually ARE doing it by running with this Hospital-Ball narrative.

And that just smacks of Piling-on which is stupid and petty.

 

Sam is not a good NFL QB but he can't catch the thrown balls for the WR's.  

Just like there needs to be accountability for the QB, there also needs to be accountability for the Wide Receiver Corp.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

It's almost like they want to give lame excuses for the WR struggles and push ALL the blame onto Sam.

They may deny they're doing it but they actually ARE doing it by running with this Hospital-Ball narrative.

And that just smacks of Piling-on which is stupid and petty.

 

Sam is not a good NFL QB but he can't catch the thrown balls for the WR's.  

Just like there needs to be accountability for the QB, there also needs to be accountability for the Wide Receiver Corp.

I mean, that’s just not happening though.  I have yet to hear a single poster claim Sam Darnold is the only problem.  

Sam is the biggest singular individual problem.    And he overall gets treated as such.  Which is pretty normal.  Collectively the OL could be considered an equal problem.  But that is a collective problem.  With no singular solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...