Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Well since PJ is probably starting this Sunday, I watched the highlights from his only other start.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There is no difference. Both QBs had no shot at being the answer.

Nobody thinks PJ Walker is the long term answer at QB for the Panthers.  Hes the backup QB, who has a decent shot at actually playing on Sunday.  If you want the Panthers to win, you should want PJ to be good. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

PJ isn’t any good either lol so I don’t see your point? PJ shouldn’t even be on an nfl roster!

Hes a backup QB...how many backup QBs out there are "good"?  If they were any good they would be a starter somewhere.  Hell, there are not even 32 "good" starting QBs out there.  Playing QB in the NFL is really hard, if you haven't already noticed. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Are there really people who dont want Sam to be good, or is he just really not any good?  There is a difference.

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

Yeah, well there are a lot of dumbasses and trolls on this website, so.....

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Then why don't people want Sam to be good?

 

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

You mean like how folks did with Cam for years? Whew buddy how things come full circle. Life is ironic.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yes there are. They want him benched, traded, cut, etc. They have no desire to see him on the field ever again. Yet they want to see what PJ has. Odd. Why? To scrape up a few wins? Sam gives us a better chance at that.

Why? Well, if you play PJ a couple games then Matt Rhule can’t get away with pretending his college QB deserves a roster spot for a 3rd straight season.  

then next season we hopefully don’t have Sam or PJ occupying roster spots.    Both are pointless. 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...