Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heinike


Paa Langfart
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's not a bad QB, he's just physically fragile.

Our D just got plain handled today and it started with us not being able to stop the run. When you can't stop the run all of a sudden everything else gets a lot harder too. They got everything they wanted running off tackle to the left all game long.

That's where Burns is most of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rico6 said:

Today's defense was otherworldly bad today. Cam making this game close is why this pill is easier to swallow. 

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

im not buying it. but agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pantherxtreme said:

So him beating Tom Brady and our top ranked defense in back to back weeks was just flukey?

Listen, I'm not diving in on how hyping up and career back-up after playing above their career means is some sort of proof they are good. Sam Darnold had like 5-TDs against the Cowboys or something for the love of god. Now he's rotting back on the bench after the film and poor tendencies start rearing their heads.

 

WAS quite literally just won their Super Bowl for this season, they had NOTHING to lose and played like it.

 

Again, agree to disagree. 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

So that would have worked this year right???

Revisionist history.. We're still aren't a good Oline.. So him playing behind the Oline the last 2 years would have been what Exactly??

Which is why the front office and coaches are sabotaging our potential for success. We use draft capital and insane salary cap on our QB blunders. We draft two WRs that have zero impact. With these decisions, there’s clearly no concern about a clean pocket. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rico6 said:

Listen, I'm not diving in on how hyping up and career back-up after playing above their career means is some sort of proof they are good. Sam Darnold had like 5-TDs against the Cowboys or something for the love of god. Now he's rotting back on the bench after the film and poor tendencies start rearing their heads.

 

WAS quite literally just won their Super Bowl for this season, they had NOTHING to lose and played like it.

 

Again, agree to disagree. 

 

I don't think anyone's hyping Heinicke like he's the 2nd coming, most people in this thread are saying the Panthers gave up on him to soon for the likes of Grier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

I agree..  I think Heinicke has figured it out. Just look! He passes every eye test. How about that side armed pass for 5 yards when Chinn was all over him? He made big time plays in big time situations... That's what great QB's do. I'm not calling Heinicke great just yet, but just look at the fire and passion he plays with. Provided he stays healthy, I expect we'll be seeing Taylor for a good while longer as the WFT starting QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...