Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heinike

Paa Langfart

By Paa Langfart,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's not a bad QB, he's just physically fragile.

Our D just got plain handled today and it started with us not being able to stop the run. When you can't stop the run all of a sudden everything else gets a lot harder too. They got everything they wanted running off tackle to the left all game long.

That's where Burns is most of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantherxtreme Mentor

Pantherxtreme

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rico6 said:

Today's defense was otherworldly bad today. Cam making this game close is why this pill is easier to swallow. 

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rico6 Grand Master

rico6

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

im not buying it. but agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rico6 Grand Master

rico6

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pantherxtreme said:

So him beating Tom Brady and our top ranked defense in back to back weeks was just flukey?

Listen, I'm not diving in on how hyping up and career back-up after playing above their career means is some sort of proof they are good. Sam Darnold had like 5-TDs against the Cowboys or something for the love of god. Now he's rotting back on the bench after the film and poor tendencies start rearing their heads.

 

WAS quite literally just won their Super Bowl for this season, they had NOTHING to lose and played like it.

 

Again, agree to disagree. 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChibCU Mentor

ChibCU

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

So that would have worked this year right???

Revisionist history.. We're still aren't a good Oline.. So him playing behind the Oline the last 2 years would have been what Exactly??

Which is why the front office and coaches are sabotaging our potential for success. We use draft capital and insane salary cap on our QB blunders. We draft two WRs that have zero impact. With these decisions, there’s clearly no concern about a clean pocket. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantherxtreme Mentor

Pantherxtreme

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rico6 said:

Listen, I'm not diving in on how hyping up and career back-up after playing above their career means is some sort of proof they are good. Sam Darnold had like 5-TDs against the Cowboys or something for the love of god. Now he's rotting back on the bench after the film and poor tendencies start rearing their heads.

 

WAS quite literally just won their Super Bowl for this season, they had NOTHING to lose and played like it.

 

Again, agree to disagree. 

 

I don't think anyone's hyping Heinicke like he's the 2nd coming, most people in this thread are saying the Panthers gave up on him to soon for the likes of Grier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dragoon11 Proficient

Dragoon11

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I mean it was bad in it's performance but Heinicke deserves credit too he was making some Favre like throws with defenders draped on him. 

That dude got some moxy, felt like that when he was here. 

I agree..  I think Heinicke has figured it out. Just look! He passes every eye test. How about that side armed pass for 5 yards when Chinn was all over him? He made big time plays in big time situations... That's what great QB's do. I'm not calling Heinicke great just yet, but just look at the fire and passion he plays with. Provided he stays healthy, I expect we'll be seeing Taylor for a good while longer as the WFT starting QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Alejandro Avila: Are We Really About To Hand Offensive Rookie Of The Year To An 'Okay' Receiver?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Adam Thielen had 1000 yards with rookie Bryce. I guess he's using that as comparison. Just kidding. Calm down. 
    • kungfoodude
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      We definitely improved from 2024 to 2025, to me the results were less important than the roster in that regard. It's better. It's still a very bad roster but continuing to be better is the goal. The changes we are talking about at QB are about spending LESS resources. Not picking up Bryce's 5th is a big potential savings. Significantly better QB's have been had in recent years for half or less than what Bryce will get in 2026. To say nothing of an extension(the ridiculous subject of this thread) which would cripple roster building by saddling it with a bloated QB contract for an awful QB. The price for Bryce, I mean who is even making that argument anymore? I don't think you are seeing anyone in this thread discussing trading up to #1 for Mendoza.  We are talking about cheap backup and FA QB's and Day 2 and 3 draft guys. That is literally tied to the idea of roster building. IMPROVE at QB while you build the roster so that we can actually potentially attract a franchise QB or when you make that big move up(SF for Lance) that your roster is so good that the impact is largely negated.  After all, improving over Bryce is an extremely low bar to hit. Let's not assume that standing pat would have resulted in a sudden spurge in good decision making. Don't forget who was making all those roster calls at the time. Bryce or not, we would have fuged it up in some way because we had idiots at the helm. We may still yet. Also, it's easy to say we can't get in the habit of switching QB's like that but there are also plenty of situations where that flip was the correct decision. Richardson to Jones, Rosen to Murray, Fields to Williams, Lance to Purdy(technically some nuance to this), etc. There is no real danger of Bryce leaving and suddenly becoming an elite QB. We all do know this, no matter how big of a Bryce stan you may be. His ceiling is middling game manager. So there isn't some crazy risk of moving on.
    • Navy_football
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Honestly. You can see it on the field. Bryce will literally skip a pass on the ground rather than throw a contested catch to XL. Especially when it's one where XL would have to fight back to the ball. Coker is actually really good at that. Coker lacks real NFL speed (not a small thing), but he maxes out in most other categories. 
×
×
  • Create New...