Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick note, re: coaching


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Such a mess, how many games have we abandoned the run? I think we ran 15 times yesterday. So the philosophy has been more like "Throw picks to guys sitting on routes they learned watching film, and get ran over by average RB's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see you back @Mr. Scot. Sorry to hear things are not going well at home.  You are the best poster on this board my friend no matter what the mouth breathers would have anyone believe. As one of the elders here I personally would hate to see you leave this place for something other than family.  May good fortune shine upon you in these troubled times my friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

It appears to me that the young prodigy has had his offense figured out.  I would say the odds are good they will not be competitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

We did get beat by Joe Judge and the New York football "Giants" backups' backups so nothing is out of the question.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Rhule is worse than Seifert. At least Seifert had success in the NFL prior to the Panthers and was a Super Bowl winning coach. Plus he did gift us Morgan, Jenkins and #89. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think Pederson would be a really good hire.  He's been there before, has plenty of knowledge about who he could bring in as NFL coaches and I think with a good DC hire he could turn this wreck around with Fitterer and Morgan.  He's an offensive guy so he'll make fixing that O-line priority #1.

I’m a big fan of hiring BBQ Dad as offensive coordinator and hiring Matt Eberflus as head coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The term you're looking for is "malinger(ed)", and he didn't.  I'm not sure why Panthers fans act like jaded ex girlfriends.  The dude is clearly injury prone as his time in San Fransico also proves. It's not like he got to San Fran and stopped having problems.
    • My long and rambling post:   The guy is all heart, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he came back even better next year. He’s exactly the guy you lock up. The money won’t ever change the way he plays.  It was a big fumble, but what 1,000 yard back fumbles once in an entire season?  Pride. This team is FINALLY seeing guys who obviously take the game very seriously. Hunt, Chuba, Thielen, Brown, Horn (CB), Coker, Bryce (IMHO). Bye bye, Spider-Man. I don’t see these dudes being OK with teammates half-assing practice or in games. I can see Brown and Horn coming over to talk to somebody.  Good team? Ummm, maybe, but will still likely lose more close games than they win unless this last draft turns in to LOB part 2. That’s a stretch.  Pretty good/decent team. Yes. They finished the season as a pretty good team. I know I sound like a broken record harping back to it, but going in to ATL and putting a 40 burger on them en route to an OT win. A bad Panthers team would have had their brakes beaten off. We’ve seen it.  Rose colored glasses on and bonging a 40 of hopium: There are watershed moments that occur that change the course of franchises, both good and bad. If Fox doesn’t pull Rodney at halftime, the epic journey that was 2003 never happens. On the negative side, Cam taking that one hit from Watt was the end of any and all Panthers relevancy and we’ve been the biggest losers in all of pro sports as a result. Watershed moments. LOB draft. Vinny goes down and the goat is born.  Will the ATL game be the spark that this franchise has desperately needed? Could it be that they hit the mega million jackpot with Princley and Scourton as eat QBs for breakfast? Sure would be nice having 2 all-pro edge guys on the cheap for the next 4 years.  A lot of unknowns, but at least it actually feels  fun again. 
    • Ok LT and Petersen are a cut above everyone else to me cmc and Faulk are interchangeable on this list.  though Faulk was better career wise
×
×
  • Create New...