Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team is in "Win Now" mode


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

Recommended Posts

The thing about the Gilmore and Henderson deals is that we've gotten partial seasons and partial games for those draft picks. Both came with a certain poison pill, too -- Gilmore won't be cheap to keep next year (and he has been good enough to make an effort to do so) and with Henderson there's always a good chance he will just hang it up and move on from football (he doesn't seem to love the game).

There's hidden costs to all of these trades. Fitterer always seems to think we can cover those costs. Life doesn't always work out that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

The Panthers have been doing that since the 2017 season ended..... 7-9, 5-11, 5-11, 5-7...

We have had years worse than those.

If we lose out and bring Rhule & Sam back there is zero indication it couldn't get worse, especially with cap limitations combined with draft option limitations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The draft was mostly wrong and showed they don't understand value or need.

 

See, I think this is faulty thinking.

The problem with our draft wasn't our draft, it was what followed.

We drafted Jaycee Horn.  He looked great and got hurt.  Should we have drafted Fields or Slater?  Maybe.  But I don't have a problem taking Horn.  Our secondary was awful last year.

We drafted Terrace Marshall.  This wasn't a problem at all.  The problem was we followed that up by re-signing Robby Anderson.  That's the mistake, not the pick.

We drafted Brady Christiansen.  We needed a tackle.  He was there.  On a team with a weak Oline, the problem is we aren't giving him playing time to develop.  That's not a draft problem, it's a coaching problem.

We drafted Tommy Tremble.  This was a great pick.  He's got a chance to be a long term starter for us.

Our first three rounds were fine.

Keith Taylor and Chuba Hubbard have looked ok for us given where we got them.

I don't think our draft was the problem.  It's how we followed the draft that was a problem.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BrianS said:

See, I think this is faulty thinking.

The problem with our draft wasn't our draft, it was what followed.

We drafted Jaycee Horn.  He looked great and got hurt.  Should we have drafted Fields or Slater?  Maybe.  But I don't have a problem taking Horn.  Our secondary was awful last year.

We drafted Terrace Marshall.  This wasn't a problem at all.  The problem was we followed that up by re-signing Robby Anderson.  That's the mistake, not the pick.

We drafted Brady Christiansen.  We needed a tackle.  He was there.  On a team with a weak Oline, the problem is we aren't giving him playing time to develop.  That's not a draft problem, it's a coaching problem.

We drafted Tommy Tremble.  This was a great pick.  He's got a chance to be a long term starter for us.

Our first three rounds were fine.

Keith Taylor and Chuba Hubbard have looked ok for us given where we got them.

I don't think our draft was the problem.  It's how we followed the draft that was a problem.

Nope.

These dummies thought 2 injury prone and mediocre olineman fixed their line and waiting till the 25 year old not good enough to start on this line I  the 3rd.

That's awful. That unit was a bigger need than CB, even with out horn and the rest of the traded ones. We had spent on nothing but D players the years before. If we would have drafted 4 olinemen it wouldn't have been an overreaction.

The failure was in evaluation and they went after their guys leaving the team crippled by that poor evaluation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Castavar said:

Gilmore wasn't a bad trade at all. We gave up what, a 2023 6th rounder or something like that? That's literally nothing. Now the Darnold trade was just dumb from the start when we could have just taken a chance on Minshew (who was better than Darnold on an even worse team) for 3 draft picks less and significantly less money. It was him or Mitchell Trubisky for me.

I will wait to judge that Henderson trade until next year, because that could still end up being a good trade. But that Darnold trade set us back. We now have to rebuild or rebuild.

Agreed and I will say, fwiw, Henderson finished last game amongst highest rated defenders and was graded over 90.  I also expect both he and Gilmore will be getting a lot more snaps with Donte being IR'd now.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We sort of hedged our bets on the 3 trade moves:

Gilmore for a 6th when he will return a 5th if he walks is just good business.

The 3rd for Henderson could mostly return (most likely a 4th) a year later if DJax walks instead of Gilmore.

For Darnold, we got 6th back with Teddy, the 4th from the Texans in the last draft.  Only the 2nd is missing and they could decide to return it but sliding back in the first because of a weak draft class at the top.

The handcuff right now is mainly the picking up the 5th year option with Darnold.  That has a chance to costs draft picks too if it needs to be off the books.

 

At this point the pick has to be OL and we should probably use a day 2 pick there too.  We also need to be using these last several weeks to figure out what we have in the rookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

The handcuff right now is mainly the picking up the 5th year option with Darnold.  That has a chance to costs draft picks too if it needs to be off the books.

Sam is here next year.  It's inevitable.  It costs us more to get rid of him than simply keep him as a backup.  I cannot envision any scenario where Sam getting moved is a net positive for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If Sam starts next year it will get worse. 

We broke him worse than NJ, it would be a complete disaster. I'm not sure how they avoid it at this point. That dead cap is a huge chunk we need elsewhere, like in any playable player or 2 lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...