Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staff options if Rhule stays...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd love for Ken Dorsey to come back here and be the OC. He already has a good relationship with Cam being his QB coach when he was here. He'd be the one to best be able to utilize Cam strengths as a passer and a runner. Especially with just how really hit or miss this QB class in the draft looks it's probably our best option to keep our current QB room and invest everything into the Oline and see if a new play caller can change things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's hoping...

Sure is nice to have your solid input on things.  I'm with you that Rhule should go.  Reality is probably not.  I would like to keep Blackburn at special teams.  He's earned it.

Replacing Brady should be from the NFL and not college.  Actually all the coaches with NFL experience (significant experience is fine with me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Ok, that's a possibility but even with the GM search our options were not top shelf and the best one walked away before the end. 

With the lack of meaningful NFL ties, the massive need for NFL experience and the crap position we are finding ourselves in I'm just having a hard time believing this will end up in more than a lame duck year for a staff that can't keep their heads above water in the NFL. I'm also not sure firing Rhule changes some of that, we are not a desirable location in 2022 for a lot of reasons. 

Love the work sir, it just sounds like we need a half court shot from guys that can't make a layup with a flat ball. (Hope that fits because I no nothing about basketball)

Take Daboll, for example.

He could come here knowing he's got two solid allies in the front office.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern about Pederson is that he has not proven successful without being under Andy Reid.  He has shown exactly one season of offensive success outside of an Andy Reid team:  2017 Philly.  That team just plain caught lightning in a bottle.  Otherwise, he's been average.

Now, average would be a step up for us, and maybe all we need, but that's what Pederson has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I mean really. This is for the whole season.

A69AD65D-C043-4F27-9FA8-C4152A9CF98F.jpeg

I'm not saying BC has been great against the eye test, but for heavens sake.  He owns the fourth best rating on our roster over the season, as a rookie, often playing out of position. 

Can the guy get some snaps without it being forced by another injury?

I swear I cannot understand this staff.  While I generally don't use PFF ratings as a bible, by this point in the season there is enough data to at least see general trends.  What I see here is that Taylor Moton has been pretty good.  Sam Tecklenburg, also pretty good.  Oh wait, we don't play him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BrianS said:

My concern about Pederson is that he has not proven successful without being under Andy Reid.  He has shown exactly one season of offensive success outside of an Andy Reid team:  2017 Philly.  That team just plain caught lightning in a bottle.  Otherwise, he's been average.

Now, average would be a step up for us, and maybe all we need, but that's what Pederson has been.

Having read some deep behind the scenes articles on the Eagles, I'd consider the fact that he won anything there, much less a Super Bowl, borderline miraculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Having read some deep behind the scenes articles on the Eagles, I'd consider the fact that he won anything there, much less a Super Bowl, borderline miraculous.

That doesn't change the fact that he hasn't shown anything aside from his time on one of king Andy's teams.  And don't forget who the coordinator for that Super Bowl season was:  Frank Reich.  Pederson's team took a nose dive when Reich departed for Indy.  Coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BrianS said:

That doesn't change the fact that he hasn't shown anything aside from his time on one of king Andy's teams.  And don't forget who the coordinator for that Super Bowl season was:  Frank Reich.  Pederson's team took a nose dive when Reich departed for Indy.  Coincidence?

Part of what was going on there too was that the Eagles were insisting on dictating his coaching staff.

As far as the coincidence, I think it had a lot to do with Carson Wentz going down the tubes as much as anything. He's resurrecting his career now but for a while he looked just awful.

For the record, I always used to hope we'd get Reich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Let's say Matt Rhule gets another year but is pressured to make changes on his staff. Who goes and who stays?

...

OC Joe Brady
TE Coach Brian Angelichio
OL Coach Pat Meyer
Pass Rush Coach Don Johnson    
ST Coach Chase Blackburn    

....

Nice writeup. I think Rhule gets year 3 barring him leaving for a top college gig. Recent examples of coaches popping in their 3rd years include Zac Taylor in Cincinnati and Kliff Kingsbury with the obvious difference being they both grabbed their QB in year 1.

I think Brady at minimum will move on although I'm not sure where; Brady doesn't seem like the college HC type. Brady has also seemed to hint that his long-term prospects in Charlotte are uncertain at best. I HOPE an experienced OC is brought in. I don't think Rhule has the leash to let another guy learn on the job.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd prefer Hackett.

I'd be good with Daboll.

I'm expecting Rhule 😒

Yeah, I'm just trying to keep my anger down until we see these last few games. 

I don't know what Rhule has to do to justify a 3rd year, plenty of reasons to not have one. Tepper can't be happy with any of this. We will see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • QuickBooks Enterprise is an accounting software for larger businesses with advanced features for managing finances, inventory, payroll, and more. Core Accounting, Inventory, Payroll, Payments, Reporting, Time Tracking, Integrations Advantages of QuickBooks Enterprise: All-in-one: Streamlines operations by managing everything in one place. Scalable: Grows with your business with its high user capacity and data volume handling. Advanced: Offers advanced features for inventory, pricing, reporting, and more. Security: Provides granular user permissions for data control. Disadvantages of QuickBooks Enterprise: Pricier: More expensive than basic QuickBooks versions. Steeper learning curve: More features can be complex to learn. Desktop-based: Limited accessibility compared to cloud solutions. Not an ERP: Not a full-featured system for very large corporations.   QuickBooks Enterprise, while powerful for mid-sized businesses, does have some limitations to consider: Limited Features for Multiple Businesses: QuickBooks Enterprise struggles with managing multiple companies. Consider cloud solutions for this. Data Capacity Limits: There's a limit on how much data you can store. Report Customization Challenges: Customizing reports can be difficult. Desktop-Based Software: No remote access or easy collaboration. Limited Integrations: Integrations might not be as smooth as cloud options. Higher Cost: More expensive than basic QuickBooks versions. How to Deal with Problems & Issues with QuickBooks Enterprise? Dealing with problems in QuickBooks Enterprise can involve a few different approaches depending on the severity of the issue. Here are some steps you can take: QuickBooks Tool Hub: Install the latest version. It fixes common errors with company files, network, program, and installation. Intuit Support Website: The Intuit QuickBooks website has a helpful knowledge base with articles and tutorials on resolving common QuickBooks Enterprise issues https://quickbooks.intuit.com/learn-support/en-us]. You can search for specific error messages or browse by topic. Contact QuickBooks Enterprise Support +1-(833)-575-6111 (No Wait) by Phone: For pressing issues or if you're stuck, QuickBooks Enterprise offers 24/7 phone support. Call their support line at +1-(833)-575-6111. Online Contact: QuickBooks Enterprise support is also available online. Go to Help > Contact Us and choose chat or a callback.
    • Not to mention, the trade back in the 2nd was A++ in terms of value to pick up a future 2nd to move back 13 spots. The trade up for Legette was also excellent. Even if you hate the picks, the draft itself was extremely successful. They got the top RB in the whole draft in the middle of the second round. A RAS monster at WR. They got who many had as TE 2, a contested catch machine with ZERO drops, in the 4th. Another explosive RAS guy at LB to develop behind Thompson and Jewell. And we’ve got whiners in here saying we got no physical traits, a TE who can’t catch, and a RB who won’t start for 3 years. People just determined to complain whether they even know what they’re complaining about or not.
    • Obviously it is not even close to offsetting the 5th rounder we swapped for a 6th rounder to move in to the first round for Legette to make sure we got the WR we wanted and secured the fifth year option. Combining the two we really messed up. Btw, this is sarcasm if that wasn’t clear.
×
×
  • Create New...