Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why not a mobile QB?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

Everyone seems to hate the Vick, The Golden Calf of Bristol, ect qb threads. My question is why not? WOuldnt our offensive scheme work great with a mobile QB? I mean, our current qb cant run or throw. I think either we get a stud qb and change schemes or get someone that causes more of a threat than just to hand off the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say the way they defend us a mobile QB would really hurt the opposing team. Vick has kept his nose clean this past season. I am not sure he is up to being #1 again but for the right amount of money he could be had.

The Golden Calf of Bristol has got to have the arm for it. If he is a strong armed QB and is accurate. It would be interesting. You know he would be there in the 2nd round too.

Go Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mobile Qb's are great as long as they can throw the ball accurately. Vick is not an accurate passer and his ratio of interceptions to passes thrown is nearly as bad as Jake's, and it was worse than Jakes until this year.

I am not convinced that The Golden Calf of Bristol will win in the NFL. To many times, a QB like him looks good in college because the talent surrounding him is so much better than the opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vick or The Golden Calf of Bristol wouldn't be an upgrade over Jake. Sounds hilarious given how bad Jake's been, but Vick hasn't exactly set the world on fire in Philadelphia either.

Vick was the wildcat formation's biggest victim. His element of surprise died when the wildcat became commonplace. Plus he's around 30 now, he can't depend on those legs forever. His career completion percentage is at around 50% too. That's poor.

As good as The Golden Calf of Bristol is at Florida, Weinke was awesome at Florida State. College success doesn't always equate to pro success.

If we really want a mobile QB we'll draft Armanti Edwards. He's a local player and all the other "top prospects" will be gone. But we won't draft him because he's decent, and we don't draft decent quarterbacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Carolina Way is gone, it went out the window with the Belichick hiring. They'll hire the best coach they can, ignoring everything else if possible.    Athletic reports that the school's top two targets are Tommy Lloyd and Billy Donovan. They don't care the buyout for a coach either, they and the boosters are willing to spend and will be going outside of the coaching family tree 100%. 
    • I don't think it's a homer though when I really feel this team can beat anyone.  The points that can be scored in bunches when the big three are on has high potential.  Moose has effort for days and IMO is the heart of the team.  And didn't see Miles becoming the team "vet" in the starting lineup just roleplaying lol.   We have to limit the turnovers though (Brandon Miller I'm looking at you bud, you are a bad ball handler) and some little things.   Colby off the bench is a cheat code and him and Kaulk have a nice little game going with the picks.    Sion playing every game and just getting better each game.  He has grit.  Grant and Green also grit.  We need replace Tillman with PJ Hall though.  Tillman looks like someone that shouldn't be on an NBA court, or at least with this team, he's just too slow for this tempo.   Even McNeely looked decent tonight and can drive.   If Kaulk and Moose could even be like 30% 3pt shooters man....
×
×
  • Create New...