Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Florio & Rich Eisen discuss Rhule & Tepper


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Being professional and using logic about the team he took over. Give him a real shot at his vision. Does a FULL rebuild only take 2 years now? Like rebuilding the QB(he has failed and still failed), OL, TE, DL, LB, CB, SS, STs etc etc. Like if your boss gives you a huge old strip mall and theres not a fully functioning deluxe condominium its place within 2 years, you stuck and should be fired?

 

What free unsigned HCs and staffs are out that you want? Doug Petterson has been tossed around, but Im meh at best.....theres no one I can think of were Im like" he is the one and can save this team". Goat Bill is going no where, dont want another college guru, andy reid loves KC BBQ, Macvay is in his heaven's land. No OCs or DCs out there worth a shot, maybe the dallas guy but my god hes soo young. So who do you got/want?

A wasted year in the name of "professionalism"? That seems the opposite of logic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I hated it.  We let a ton of talent slide right past us in the name of adding picks.   Who is contributing right now from this draft?

Horn looked amazing before he was hurt.

Hubbard looks pretty good as a backup. Tremble, Taylor and Nixon have all had their moments, as did Marshall when we used him.

Christensen would probably look pretty good too but he's being so poorly handled by this amateur hour coaching staff that it's hard to know.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Horn looked amazing before he was hurt.

Hubbard looks pretty good as a backup. Tremble, Taylor and Nixon have all had their moments, as did Marshall when we used him.

Christensen would probably look pretty good too but he's being so poorly handled by this amateur hour coaching staff that it's hard to know.

I know people don’t like JAGs but I’ll take 1 potential super star and a draft full of rotational talent  which could develop into good talent any day.

Wish we would have picked up another lineman but I’d rather have this draft then that shoe horn abomination from 2016

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For one, the bullsh-t that a guy who had only coached at places like Temple and Baylor (and hadn't even won so much as a conference championship at those places) deserved to have full control of an NFL operation.

Don't care how hot a coach anyone thought Rhule was at the time. That was one of the stupidest decisions I've ever seen, and that comes from someone who watched fifteen seasons of Marty Hurney running the team.

I don't really know what you expected.  Isn't a GM and Coach supposed to work together to get the guys the coach wants that fit his scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I know people don’t like JAGs but I’ll take 1 potential super star and a draft full of rotational talent  which could develop into good talent any day.

Wish we would have picked up another lineman but I’d rather have this draft then that shoe horn abomination from 2016

Fitterer's guidelines on the type of players they wanted were set by Rhule, yet it still worked out pretty well.

Would love to see what happens when you get a better coach in here to work with him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I hated it.  We let a ton of talent slide right past us in the name of adding picks.   Who is contributing right now from this draft?

FYI - I do not judge rookies unless they are cut or make pro-bowl. After the 2nd full off-season I start.

Id have to reaaallly out out on limb and stretch the reasons hardcore.

A tad unfair cause Horn looked like a legit CB, rookie or not.

TMJ, boy...I think Brady was fired for him, Teddy, Sam, and just making bad opinions...

Christ has gotten a few reps and looked "decent" at LT,RG,LG.

Temble looks like the best TE and that means nothing.

Hubbard, ok good 4th rounder. High effort and energy

Taylor- best 5th rounder league wide, jewel of this draft...

Nixon- got IR'd was giving 15-20 high quailty snaps before

Brown- Rhule thinks hes too fat...been non-factor

Shi- non-factor

Forgot name- Long safety that was IR'd to save face. Joke of pick

Hoskins- when fianlly given a jersey, looked petty good for a 7th

 

Id trade the 2022 3rd for CJ henderson right now again. NO question. Darryl Johnson for a 6th, well thats on Dan morgans plate. Can not expect much form an 6th in any draft. He did get 7th for Greg Little. Got a improved 6th for Perryman who seemed to be be a bad fit(i disagree). 

No GM bats 1.000

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I don't really know what you expected.  Isn't a GM and Coach supposed to work together to get the guys the coach wants that fit his scheme.

I'm fine with that sort of arrangement, but ours is not that simple.

Rhule has final say over everything in the program. It's the same model Seattle has with Pete Carroll, but Pete Carroll was a guy with real NFL experience and a far higher level of success at the college level than Matt Rhule.

Giving Rhule that kind of power was like taking the assistant manager at the local McDonald's and making him CEO of the corporation.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Do you want to fire any HC that struggles? If that the case the panthers would have had 21 more HCs during their history. 

No. I want to fire any head coach who struggles while looking utterly clueless with ample signs that he's losing the locker room and instilling a culture of no accountability. Rhule is checking every box. I would feel completely differently if we were struggling whole showing signs of progress. This is the opposite of that. Everyone on the roster looks like they're regression and schematically we look like a mid-major college team. Hmmm... imagine that.

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been a wait and see optimist with Bryce….but this worries me a lot. You have to be able to command a team as a QB. It’s one of the most underrated qualities of the position. How many quiet qbs like that have you seen really be successful or lead a team to long term success? Cam has already mentioned this about Bryce and it does not seem like things have changed much since last season on him being more vocal. 
    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
×
×
  • Create New...