Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Florio & Rich Eisen discuss Rhule & Tepper


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not certain Tepper even had a clue that Hurney was a bad GM until Rhule came along.

(for whatever else you can say about Rhule, we do at least have to thank him for that)

Does he get that Rhule is bad? Don't know. He fell for Rhule's bullsh-t when he hired him. Does he still believe it? Who can say?

I'll give him that he did fire Rivera. Here's hoping that same clarity applies to Matt Rhule.

Pretty sure Tepper looked at Hurney’s track record and knew that nobody else wanted him after he got axed by JR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Did they talk about how Tep is juggling too many things to devote enough time to the panthers to be successful..,  and now....at BOFA stadium, the charlotte football club is having their draft tonight, (sure hes there) ... throw in the fantasy land in rock hill and appaloosa, theres no time to make important hard decisions on the panthers...thats why we're a dumpster fire... hes just a money man at heart...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was done with Rhule as soon as he made that trade. 

I thought Darnold was a pretty good risk.  Highly regarded QB that was the #3 overall pick.   Prospect grade by the NFL was "7.10 - Pro Bowl Talent".  Had NFL size, arm strength and a good college pedigree from a top program.  The Jets franchise was widely known as fairly dysfunctional so maybe he could succeed on the Panthers.  Darnold was still pretty young but he now had 3 years of NFL experience.  

It was a decent gamble to make.  Just didn't work out for a number of reasons (bad OC, porous OL, no strong run game after CMC went down, maybe Sam just didn't have the talent after all).   If it had worked, would have been a bargain for the draft picks we gave up.  But it didn't.  

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I thought Darnold was a pretty good risk.  Highly regarded QB that was the #3 overall pick.   Prospect grade by the NFL was "7.10 - Pro Bowl Talent".  Had NFL size, arm strength and a good college pedigree from a top program.  The Jets franchise was widely known as fairly dysfunctional so maybe he could succeed on the Panthers.  Darnold was still pretty young but he now had 3 years of NFL experience.  

It was a decent gamble to make.  Just didn't work out for a number of reasons (bad OC, porous OL, no strong run game after CMC went down, maybe Sam just didn't have the talent after all).   If it had worked, would have been a bargain for the draft picks we gave up.  But it didn't.  

He's trash. This staff puts WAY too much stock into what a guy's draft status was. Statistically, Darnold has probably been the worst QB in the NFL during his short career. Sadly, I was proven correct on both Teddy and Darnold. They are what I thought they were. Teddy is a backup. Darnold isn't NFL roster caliber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I thought Darnold was a pretty good risk.  Highly regarded QB that was the #3 overall pick.   Prospect grade by the NFL was "7.10 - Pro Bowl Talent".  Had NFL size, arm strength and a good college pedigree from a top program.  The Jets franchise was widely known as fairly dysfunctional so maybe he could succeed on the Panthers.  Darnold was still pretty young but he now had 3 years of NFL experience.  

It was a decent gamble to make.  Just didn't work out for a number of reasons (bad OC, porous OL, no strong run game after CMC went down, maybe Sam just didn't have the talent after all).   If it had worked, would have been a bargain for the draft picks we gave up.  But it didn't.  

3 draft picks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's trash. This staff puts WAY too much stock into what a guy's draft status was. Statistically, Darnold has probably been the worst QB in the NFL during his short career. Sadly, I was proven correct on both Teddy and Darnold. They are what I thought they were. Teddy is a backup. Darnold isn't NFL roster caliber.

I was hopeful but you are exactly right.  Sam's stats for Carolina are almost exactly what he did in NY.  About 220 ypg, 60 % completion, 1:1 TD:INT - it's uncanny how similar his numbers are on both teams.  Darnold's QBR even went down a bit while he was at the Panthers.  That's just who he is.  

Darnold NFL stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I was hopeful but you are exactly right.  Sam's stats for Carolina are almost exactly what he did in NY.  About 220 ypg, 60 % completion, 1:1 TD:INT - it's uncanny how similar his numbers are on both teams.  Darnold's QBR even went down a bit while he was at the Panthers.  That's just who he is.  

Darnold NFL stats

He's just bad. He has talent but he sticks on his first read too long and then just plain panics if he doesn't come open after staring him down for three seconds.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

3 draft picks?

Would you trade a 2, 4 and a 6 for a good young starting QB ?   I think most teams would.  

Darnold just proved not to be any good.  As LinvilleGorge correctly pointed out, he isn't roster caliber at this point.  

The worst thing was the Panthers picking up Darnold's option.  So the team is on the salary cap hook for a big chunk of change for him now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

How did you feel after the 2020 season?

How do you feel after 3-0 start?

What were your expectations coming into this year?

Be honest. 

I actually felt pretty good at 3-0

them we gagged away the Philly game, and got run over by the Vikings in OT…both at home

then the giants game….man that was about as ugly as it gets…that was where I was pretty much done

But got thru some games, we got to 5-5, with skins at home….that was the game where our season ended

you tankers probably gonna get your way…we won’t win again this year

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yes, but Darnold was not a good starting QB when we traded for him.

Yeah, it was clearly a serious error by the Panthers scouting & talent evaluation.  Maybe some hubris too by the Carolina coaching staff thinking they could "fix" Darnold when NY couldn't.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlitzMonster said:

Yeah, it was clearly a serious error by the Panthers scouting & talent evaluation.  Maybe some hubris too by the Carolina coaching staff thinking they could "fix" Darnold when NY couldn't.  

 

My issue with the trade is not that they took the shot, but how it was done.  They paid too much, but more importantly there was no backup plan.  Sam turning things around was far from a guarantee, but we didn't have another NFL caliber QB on the roster entering the season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

My issue with the trade is not that they took the shot, but how it was done.  They paid too much, but more importantly there was no backup plan.  Sam turning things around was far from a guarantee, but we didn't have another NFL caliber QB on the roster entering the season.

I definitely agree with this.   I mean Teddy wasn't anything great but at least he could game manage and the team was already paying him.  Why not keep him on roster in case Darnold doesn't cut it ?  If nothing else Teddy would have been a great backup QB.

My best guess is that Rhule wanted Sam to be "the man" and that by having Teddy around, somehow that wouldn't be possible.   Divided loyalties in the locker room between the two QB or something like that.   But any pro athlete would tell you that it's all about competition and whoever wins it deserves the shot.   So going all in on unproven Sam with no alternative was a risky move that eventually blew up in Rhule's face.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...