Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OC Options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

A Bobby Slowik & Jon Embree would be one of my top choices from SF coming as a package of young guns.

See what he can do with better TE integration for Tremble’s development and they’ve been Kyle S’s right hands behind that new promising OC of theirs.

Although if we just fired Rhule, could get Hacket AND Gray to possibly come here from GB and build something special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actively rooting for us to interview poo candidates. 

How sad is that?

Like, I should want a great candidate to helm our offense as a fan of this team, but if he brings in someone decent, he stays our HC next year. If he brings in someone terrible, he might get fired this year. If he brings in someone terrible and we hire them, then we will suck and he will be fired but not until next year. 

I feel like there's only one winning strategy here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, davos said:

I’d prefer Kubiak’s professional “brother” in Rick Dennison who’s trying to teach up mini-Gary.

And prefer as in prefer rather than Kubiak. Don’t want to touch someone from the Vikes offensive staff.

12th in yards and 15th in points would be a massive upgrade for Carolina's offense. We could do a lot worse than Kubiak considering the situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I'm actively rooting for us to interview poo candidates. 

How sad is that?

Like, I should want a great candidate to helm our offense as a fan of this team, but if he brings in someone decent, he stays our HC next year. If he brings in someone terrible, he might get fired this year. If he brings in someone terrible and we hire them, then we will suck and he will be fired but not until next year. 

I feel like there's only one winning strategy here. 

I will be hoping we get our ass kicked in every game next year. I want maximum embarrassment for Tepper. fug that guy and fug rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda surprised we haven't heard anything about Pat Shurmur.

Shurmur wasn't a good head coach but he's been a great OC for more than one team. He's also got a connection here in Jeff Nixon. The two of them were on staff together some years back in Philly.

Mind you, if Nixon wants the job himself, that might make him less likely to recommend Shurmur, but hey... 😕

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...